tpo3
The reading asserts that the painting could not be a work by Rembrandt. However, all the point in the reading are questioned by the listening, claiming that the painting were actually painted by Rembrandt.
Firstly, the reading claims that the woman, a servant, in the portrait was dressed a fur collar which she couldn’t afford it. By contrast, the lecturer argues that the fur wasn’t belong to the original painting. The pigment of the fur was painted over top of the original painting. And it was painted after the painting finished one hundred year. Maybe some people wanted the painting looking more valuable and the lady looking more rich. In this way, the lecturer contradicts the first idea in the reading.
Second, the reading states that the shadow and light of the painting do not fit together. While according to the lecturer, this is not the case. The lecturer presents that the added fur color was removed. The woman was wearing a light color cloth, the light was illuminating the woman face. Actually the original painting was Rembrandt composition which light was realistic and met the expert of people.
Finally, the reading holds that several pieces of wood glued together was not the way of Rembrandt painted. By casting doubt to the third idea of the reading, the professor in the listening point out when the fur color changed the wood panel also enlarged with added pieces glued to the side. Then the painting seemed more grander and valuable. But the painting indeed was worked by Rembrandt. Researchers found that the piece of wood in this painting was same as Rembrandt another painting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'grander' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: grander
...d to the side. Then the painting seemed more grander and valuable. But the painting indeed w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, second, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97802197802 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47834074442 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490842490842 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8460567209 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.5 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.