TPO36
Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a method of reducing hail, called "cloud seeding," has been tried. In cloud seeding, the chemical silver iodide is sprayed on storm clouds from an airplane. This makes the clouds produce harmless rain or snow instead of hail. Several pieces of evidence suggest that cloud seeding has been effective in protecting crops from hail.
Laboratory experiments
Experiments in the laboratory support the idea that cloud seeding is effective. Hail usually forms water vapor that is close to the freezing point However, when experimenters added silver iodide to cold water vapor in the laboratory, they often observed light snow forming instead of hail pellets.
Evidence from Asia
There is evidence about the effectiveness of cloud seeding from several countries around the world. In some Asian countries, for example, cloud seeding has been successfully used to control precipitation in urban areas. These positive results suggest that cloud seeding should also be effective in protecting fields and farms in the United States.
Local studies
A few local studies also support the value of cloud seeding. One study conducted in a farming region in the central United States, for example, directly monitored crop damage due to hail. The study found that in an area where cloud seeding was used there was reduced hail damage compared to previous years.
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the way that what can government do for the problem of cloud seedings. In the riding part, the author mentions that there are several ways that cloud seedigs has impact on protecting crops form hail; in the listening part. however, the professor challenges what the author state and refutes the reasons.
To begin with, as mentioned in the artick, the author suggest that based on the laboratory experimants, it means that adding silver to cold water, caqn be effective; nevertheless, in the listening part, the speaker refuts the reasons asseting that silver can actually effect on the quantity of the rain, resulting in lack of water and indeed couse drought. it has negative effect on raising crops.
Secondly, the author sets forth that evidences from asian countries indicate that they can use to control the damages in urban erias. Nonetheless, the lecturer flatly contradicts the the reasons and dontends that it might not repeated in the us. urban reigon has high pollution and in the asian countries they have used it on urban airia not in rurals. In hance, it cannot be effective on unpolluted riagons such as the place of farm lands.
Finally, the author claims that local studies improved the fact that the places that the clids seedngs was there, the damages was less that others places. In contrasts, the professor is off the opinion that it has resulted in natrual variation not just the clould seeds. I mean the resuly of this is not realetto the clolds or what the author claims.
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement. It is better to use printed material such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet. 90
- tpo36 Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, 80
- TPO 38- Integrated writingThe world's forests are facing increasing pressure which, if unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implem 3
- A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching Which of following plan is better 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to 76
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing TaskThe cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful i 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...crops form hail; in the listening part. however, the professor challenges what the auth...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...lack of water and indeed couse drought. it has negative effect on raising crops. ...
^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...heless, the lecturer flatly contradicts the the reasons and dontends that it might not ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...heless, the lecturer flatly contradicts the the reasons and dontends that it might not ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, finally, however, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, i mean, in contrast, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91254752852 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4074837418 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574144486692 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4789797817 49.2860985944 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06452816374 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0761225552746 0.272083759551 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0232995287982 0.0996497079465 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363652179996 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432277794782 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416398057233 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.