TPO39
The reading passage explores the issues of extinction of more than half all living species, and several reasons are offered in support of this argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and contradicts it for the following reasons.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggests that the decline of sea levels, the lecturer argues that even sea levels fall, the species can adapt the environment to survive. This is because sea level causes the negative result after a million years, which means the Egosystem are still fine when sea level falls. Obviously, the lecturer's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Secondly, the statement held by the writer claims that widespread volcanic activity. Nonetheless, it is argued in the listening that SO2 in the atmosphere cause lower temperature in the short period. The lecturer gives the truth that SO2 is cleared out when it dissolve into water and make a rainfall.
Last but not least, the lecturer acutely identifies the weakness in the reading passage that asteroid hits Earth's surface. The lecturer convincingly points out that crater is found in Earth's surface; moreover, in order to establish a solid and concrete statement, she offers the example that the extinction of species in not mainly cause by asteroid, because when asteroid happened the extinction is already happened.
In conclusion, based on the argument presented above, it can be clearly seen that the stances on the both sides are paradoxical. Although the contents in the reading passage seem to be plausible, further scrutiny leads the lecturer to believe the point of view in the reading passage are not correct.
- The effective leader makes an effort to let others feel that he or she has been part of a decision. 70
- tpo47 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tpo39 3
- TPO48 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ne when sea level falls. Obviously, the lecturers argument disproves its counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dissolves'?
Suggestion: dissolves
...e truth that SO2 is cleared out when it dissolve into water and make a rainfall. Last...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2037037037 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63126970243 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4704634283 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.083333333 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.42419426049 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 63.6247240618 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.