Tpo39- Integrated writing
The reading discusses the mass-extinction occured at the end of triassic period. The author mentions that it caused around half of the living animals extict in a short time, whereas there is no distinct explanation for it. Otherwise, the speaker points out the theories described in the passage, at time, opposes them.
First of all, accordinf to the lecturer, scientists concure with the fact explained in the article, sea levels descended at the end of the triassic era, she expresses that it lasts many years to affect on them, though; it is because of land-species ability that they are always able to adapt themselves to the rough circumstances.
Furthermore, the author connects the reason of the mass-extinction to the volcanos' eruptions. The so2 rises as a result of volcanic activity can play a role of obstrucle against the sunlight. it could maintain the temperature low. On the other word, the cold weather maybe one of the feasable reasons. Although, the speaker rejects this claim. she asserts that so2 would be cleared out of the atmosphere in a short time, hence it couldn't be the options.
Finally, the lecturer declares that many experts are in the opinion of the third theory explained by the author, plus she says that it can be dated to the extinction's era. The claim, it happened 2 million years before the extinction, which mentioned by her contracts to the final theory becayse 2 million years is too long not to do anything with it.
- TPO20 Integrated writing 65
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- TPO20 – Independent: A/D? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. 60
- TPO-50 - Independent Writing Taskall university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. 76
- TPO 51 Integrated Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e expresses that it lasts many years to affect on them, though; it is because of land-spe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...role of obstrucle against the sunlight. it could maintain the temperature low. On ...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ther maybe one of the feasable reasons. Although, the speaker rejects this claim. she as...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...though, the speaker rejects this claim. she asserts that so2 would be cleared out o...
^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...he atmosphere in a short time, hence it couldnt be the options. Finally, the lecturer...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'extinctions'' or 'extinction's'?
Suggestion: extinctions'; extinction's
...us she says that it can be dated to the extinctions era. The claim, it happened 2 million y...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, may, so, third, whereas, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77707265735 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.1436416693 49.2860985944 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.