TPO41
In this sect of materials, the reading part discusses the oppositing of power companies for recycling coal ash and introduce some result in order to show these activites are not necessary. and the listening section refutes the information presented in the passage, and, argues that power pompanies should recycle thier wast products and recyvling is very important.
First, the passage posits that these kind of pollutions are allways exist and and companies reduce pollutions. However, the lecture makes the point that companies activites are not sufficient ne landfile is harmful and creates signeficant damage such as polluting of ground water where landfile created.
Second, according to the text whenever coal ash is stored makes recycling discourge and recycling of coal ash is harmful. the speaker disagrres with this point, and, asserts that other materials are more harmful than coal ash such as mercory, these kind of material store and recycle with out any problem.
Third, the article claims that whenever companie store coal ash makes price increase. on the contrary the lecture points out that by all these activites price increase only 1 percent.
In conclusion the talk
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?To improw the quality of the education, university should spend more money on salaries for university professors. use specific reason and examples to support your ansewr. 73
- some people to take a position in a company and work for the company. other people think it is better to go into business for themselves. which do you think is better? give reasons and examples to support your response. 68
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
- some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. do you think this is a good a idea? 76
- summerise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific point made in the reading passage. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...show these activites are not necessary. and the listening section refutes the infor...
^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...ortant. First, the passage posits that these kind of pollutions are allways exist and and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...se kind of pollutions are allways exist and and companies reduce pollutions. However, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...e and recycling of coal ash is harmful. the speaker disagrres with this point, and,...
^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
... harmful than coal ash such as mercory, these kind of material store and recycle with out ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...hese kind of material store and recycle with out any problem. Third, the article claims...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ie store coal ash makes price increase. on the contrary the lecture points out tha...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, so, third, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 188.0 270.72406181 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33510638298 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54000918752 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601063829787 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 419.366225166 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1666386931 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0604366624955 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247081511636 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257112236991 0.0662205650399 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.030929415419 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166583585809 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.