tpo45
First, the reading declares that there is some doubt about the nest that had been found in the state of Arizona about whether is related to bees nest or not. The lecturer, however, sees all the idea dubious and demonstrates some evidence to refutes them all.
First, the author maintains that the first bees fossils that had been found exhibit an existence of bees in 100 million years ago while the recent fossil belongs to 200 million years ago and there is a distinct gap between these two. In contrast, the professor accentuates the fact that the reason why there is no trace of bees fossil in 200 million years ago is probably that in that era trees did not produce a usable resin which bees could adequately preserve on. Thus, until the time that trees began to generate this sticky resin 100 million years ago, it was impossible for bees to could remain immune in any fossil.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that experiments evince a mutual evolution in bees and flower plants. Moreover, hence in 200 million years ago, the planet was void of any flowering plants and first sing of those found 125 million years ago it is unlikely that the fossil is related to bees. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the fact that bees 200 million years ago were feeding on none-flowering plants like pine trees. In addition, when flower plants exuded on plants, bees began to have close evolve process with them.
Finally, the reading contends that in the chambers found in the nest inside that fossil there is no sign of any caps that today's bees produce and it is probable that that nest was the result of other insects.
On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that a chemical study which was carried out on this nest displayed that there is a material in that early nest which is for preventing the penetration of water in the nest, and those materials also exist in the nest of today's bees.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66374269006 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27287794347 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485380116959 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3207679106 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 110.228320801 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0909090909 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06452816374 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844809146002 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386430066665 0.0996497079465 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0221173883783 0.0662205650399 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513188097387 0.162205337803 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146752866077 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.34 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.