tpo59
The reading text and lecture are both about the large plain of Jar found by the archeologist near by the Southeastern Asia country Laos. While, the author present some theories about the real purpose of these jars, the lecturer disputes all this theories and claim that real purpose of these jars are still mystery for the scientists.
Fist of all, reading suggests that, ancient peoples were used this jar for the fermentation process. It is also states that, these jar were constructed by the king to prepare the drink at time celebration of the victory. However, the lecturer refutes this claim and argue that, the original fermentation vessels are made out of the clay, But, these jar is made up of the stone. It is very expansive and time consuming top make stone jar for fermentation. Additionally, He said that, if there is east way was available for the construction of the clay vessels, then why the they choose that tough way of fermentation.
Secondly, reading text claim that, major purpose of these jars were the water storage. Travelers were use this water during their migration for making trade. In contrast to that, professor points out that, trade route on which those traveler were travelled was near by the river. So, they did not require any additional source of water during their travelling hours.
In last, writer believes that, Jars are originally used for as the tomb, to stored the human remaining like some precious artifacts. On the other hand, tutor is opposes this claim and goes on to say that, if those jars was used as a storage purpose of the some valuables like beads, golden artifacts, then it must have the lead to cover the jar. Although, the archeologists who are working on that site has not found anu kind of cover, not even in the nearby area.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 68 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | heartqq | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 66
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage 3
- TPO61 3
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job 66
- There are times when it is acceptable not to tell the truth Agree or disagree 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... plain of Jar found by the archeologist near by the Southeastern Asia country Laos. Whi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f these jars, the lecturer disputes all this theories and claim that real purpose of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...struction of the clay vessels, then why the they choose that tough way of fermentation. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...which those traveler were travelled was near by the river. So, they did not require any...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...rs was used as a storage purpose of the some valuables like beads, golden artifacts,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, in contrast, kind of, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7935483871 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46875163826 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551612903226 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7008295322 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06452816374 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340985386085 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127458160696 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542378124281 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20247528902 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293381373659 0.0443174109184 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.