Travelling to Mars
The article and the lecture both deal this the possibility of travelling to Mars. While the author of the text offers three reasons for thinking that the mission is not likely to succeed, the lecturer opposes the writer’s claims. In his opinion, there can be solutions for many of the obstacles.
First, the author mentions that the first obstacle for this mission is the lack of air, and that astronauts would need to bring oxygen to Mars. Furthermore, it is stated in the article that oxygen burns easily on this planet, and therefore bringing oxygen is really dangerous. In contrast, the professor argues that the Mars’ atmosphere consists of the carbon dioxide which can be broken on carbon and oxygen by a new device. On top of that, he maintains that the mentioned new invention is being tested now on Mars and is functioning well.
Second, the writer mentions another problem that there are no lakes on Mars, therefore it would be impossible to live there for a long time. Additionally, it is stated in the article that astronauts wouldn’t be able to grow plants there and could starve if the food from the Earth became damaged. However, the lecturer calls this argument into question by saying that there is water ice on Mars, which can be melted and drunk. Moreover, he highlights that people can use this water to raise some crops right on Mars.
Finally, the author asserts that the radiation on Mars can influence in a very dangerous way on the astronauts and even lead to skin cancer. In addition to that, the radiation can damage the brain, and people can lose their decision-making abilities. As opposed to the writer, the professor holds that radiation can be blocked by rock and ice, which can be used in building the habitants. He also adds that astronauts’ spacesuits can protect them from the radiation when they get out of the habitants.
To summarize, whereas the writer claims that there is no possibility of travelling to Mars, the lecturer thinks the opposite.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | SaC | 71 | view |
| 2021-04-10 | niloofar_parsa | 60 | view |
| 2020-09-18 | Ever | 75 | view |
| 2018-12-02 | mhmod2222 | 70 | view |
- The Phoenicians were an ancient civilization that emerged in the eastern Mediterranean around 1500 BCE They were known for their seafaring skills and played a significant role in trade and commerce While some historians have suggested that the Phoenicians 80
- The Phoenicians were an ancient civilization that emerged in the eastern Mediterranean around 1500 BCE They were known for their seafaring skills and played a significant role in trade and commerce While some historians have suggested that the Phoenicians 80
- Travelling to Mars 78
- Arles Bust When the Arles Bust was found in 2007 people around the world were excited that the true appearance of the Roman Emperor Julius Caesar was finally known However there is good reason to believe that it is really just a publicity stunt surroundin 60
- The Phoenicians were an ancient civilization that emerged in the eastern Mediterranean around 1500 BCE They were known for their seafaring skills and played a significant role in trade and commerce While some historians have suggested that the Phoenicians 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...f that, he maintains that the mentioned new invention is being tested now on Mars and is func...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1373.03311258 121% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6072101073 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505847953216 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.612191921 49.2860985944 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.5 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4375 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106341649263 0.272083759551 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375839973306 0.0996497079465 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566319019166 0.0662205650399 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065489517926 0.162205337803 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433098923008 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.