Use of hydrogen based fuel engine cell.
The article discuss possible alternative source to automobile’s internal combustion engine. The writer propose that hydrogen based fuel cell is the most promising technology and discuss it’s pros. Professor admit that there are problem associated with internal combustion engine, but thinks that writer is way too optimistic about hydrogen based fuel cell engine and it is not the solution.
First, the pessage state that internal combustion based engine use petroleum which is finite in the nature and we may run short of it in the future and thus advocate about using hydrogen based engine as it is easily available and can be even extracted from water. The professor agree abut the finite nature of petroleum but mentions the technological problem associate with the hydrogen fuel. In order to use hydrogen as a fuel source it should be in liquid form which is very hard technologically to achieve. Further, it should be stored at -253 degree celsius, which make it unpractical to use.
Second, writer states that hydrogen powered engine will solve many pollution related problems. As petroleun product generate carbon dioxide and menthane, which is harmful to environment, byproduct from a fuel cell engine is only water. The professor disagrees. She explains that in order to create hydrogen as a fuel from water, it will need the involvement of indusrues, which will work on coal and oil. So, the fuel engine car may not harm environment but the the creation of hydrogen will be responsible for generating equal pollution.
The writer also notes that the fuel engine cell will be more cost efficient, as, it will run on half of the fuel to travel same distance needed by internal combustion engine. The professor rebuts this argument. According to her, fuel cell engine require platinum for pepper functioning, which is a very rare adn expensive element. In absence of platinum, there will not be chemical reaction to produce electricity. Furthermore, use of other cheaper material to replace platinum were also unsuccessful. So, they may require less fuel, but the making the engine will be very expensive, and thus the overall cost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | nilav | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | himanshu186 | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to too much information creates problems Which view do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'discusses'.
Suggestion: discusses
The article discuss possible alternative source to automobi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'proposes'.
Suggestion: proposes
... internal combustion engine. The writer propose that hydrogen based fuel cell is the mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: IT_IS[10]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...e most promising technology and discuss it’s pros. Professor admit that there are pr...
^^^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'admits'.
Suggestion: admits
...nology and discuss it’s pros. Professor admit that there are problem associated with ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'problems'?
Suggestion: problems
...’s pros. Professor admit that there are problem associated with internal combustion eng...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun pollution seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much pollution', 'a good deal of pollution'.
Suggestion: much pollution; a good deal of pollution
...that hydrogen powered engine will solve many pollution related problems. As petroleun product ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...engine car may not harm environment but the the creation of hydrogen will be responsibl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...engine car may not harm environment but the the creation of hydrogen will be responsibl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 350.0 270.72406181 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71238429641 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 145.348785872 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5765288577 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 7.06452816374 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482212921416 0.272083759551 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142135123635 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106982307533 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300276354124 0.162205337803 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493237201262 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.