Whether the painting was a work by Rembrandt?
The reading asserts that the painting could not be a work by Rembrandt. However, all the point in the reading are questioned by the listening, claiming that the painting were actually painted by Rembrandt.
Firstly, the reading claims that the woman, a servant, in the portrait was dressed a fur collar which she couldn’t afford it. By contrast, the lecturer argues that the fur wasn’t belong to the original painting, because the pigment of the fur was painted over top of the original painting. After the painting finished one hundred year the fur was painted by someone else. Maybe they wanted the painting looking more valuable and the lady looking more rich. In this way, the lecturer contradicts the first idea in the reading.
Second, the reading states that the shadow and light of the painting do not fit together. While according to the lecturer, this is not the case. The lecturer presents that the added fur color was removed. The woman was wearing a light color cloth, the light was illuminating the woman face. Actually the original painting was Rembrandt composition which light was realistic and met the expert of people.
Finally, the reading holds that several pieces of wood glued together was not the way of Rembrandt painted. By casting doubt to the third idea of the reading, the professor in the listening point out when the fur color changed the wood panel also enlarged with added pieces glued to the side, to made the painting grander and valuable. Whereas the painting indeed was worked by Rembrandt. Researchers found that the piece of wood in this painting was same as Rembrandt another painting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | TiOluwani97 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | guna | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | nusybah | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-14 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
- gold mask 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- tpo3 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
- Advertising is the only main cause of unhealthy eating habits. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nted over top of the original painting. After the painting finished one hundred year ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 337, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...made the painting grander and valuable. Whereas the painting indeed was worked by Rembr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, firstly, however, look, may, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4833621571 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6198789078 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.625 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430455630587 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167614580559 0.0996497079465 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148081049782 0.0662205650399 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282514197526 0.162205337803 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659041298912 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.