William Shakespeare work and life.
The article introduces the topic of the controversy and rumors about William Shakespeare’s existence. More specifically, the writer discusses that Shakespeare’s work was made by another author and he did not really exist. The lecturer in the listening passages disagrees. She believes that the world-while famous writer really existed and attack each of the claims made in the listening.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that one posible candidate is Francis Bacos. This is because the coincidences in some legal references in the poetry work between William’s and the previous writings of Bacon. The lecturer, however, disagrees. She states that, in fact, there are contradictions between the ideas of these both authors. For example, Bacon missundertood some of the ideas that Shakespeare exposed in his work, like astronomical believes at the time.
The author also claims that Christopher Marlowe is a poet who could be under Shakespeare name. First, he lived in the same period of time than William and it is believed that he faked his death to go away from some personal problems. Again, the lecturer believes there are flaws in the writer’s argument. The speaker holds that there is no reason for Marlowe to use another name in order to publish his work. Actually, he publicized his poems until his death with his own name. After that, there are a lot of sonets and poems under the name of Shakeaspeare.
Another reason why the author feels that William’s work was made by another writer is that there are acussations refered to Edward de Vere. This author’s work was exclusively for the noble class. Thus, the acussations started because since his desire to reach more audience, he had been working under the famous author’s name. The professor is doubtful that this is accurate. She puts forward the fact that this scenario is imposible since Edaward died before the Shakespeare’s work appeared. On the top of that the professor afirms that de Vere died in 1604, over 15 years before Willliam’s publications. She goes on to say that it is unlikely that they keep the work to be published after for one main reason: no one knew what kind of work Williams wanted to post.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-18 | RicardoRH | 71 | view |
| 2015-06-02 | SarahAlsalihi | 65 | view |
- Agree or disagree with 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 70
- Young people reading less literature and how this affects culture 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 2 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...thors. For example, Bacon missundertood some of the ideas that Shakespeare exposed in his w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
... exposed in his work, like astronomical believes at the time. The author also claims...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...peare name. First, he lived in the same period of time than William and it is believed that he...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, really, so, thus, while, for example, in fact, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1373.03311258 135% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03532608696 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78339275426 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 13.0662251656 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6295140446 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2272727273 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262217270056 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704958248459 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735288356008 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169636383494 0.162205337803 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535851716598 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.