woman in a white dress belongs to James McNeill Whistler. may be written by another painter
The reading and the lecture are both about a painting and who is it's possible creator could be? The author of the reading states that the painting is more likely drawn by an American painter called Whistler. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that the painting is not Whistler's art.
To begin with, the author argues that the painting was first exhibited by one of the Whistler’s closest friends after his death. It is mentioned in the article that the exhibitor has later attributed this painting to Whistler. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says, the exhibitor was not a close friend to Whistler. Additionally, he says that the exhibition contains a lot of paintings from other painters too which shows that the attribution of that painting to Whistler is not true.
Secondly, the author suggests that the painting style is similar to the style of Whistler’s most renowned paintings. In the article,it is said that the woman is the painting is similar to the woman in Whistler’s most famous “Symphony in White” art and also the usage of grey and black dots resembles the style of Whistler art. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that there are a lot of other painters who used to paint with the similar style as Whisler. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that the woman in “Symphony in the White” and the usage of monochromatic black, grey colours were the most popular things back then.
Finally, the author posits that though there’s no signature of Whistler but the painting had a small butterfly which was used to present in almost all Whistler’s paintings. Moreover, in the article, it is stated that this butterfly is the proof that it is a Whistler’s art. In contrast, the lecturer position is that the butterfly was of different shape, colour and in different postion than what used to be Whistler’s painting. He notes that the butterfly was not present at the time of painting but was added later in an attempt to forgery Whistler’s art.
In conclusion, the reading and the lecturer have contrasting views about the painting’s origin.
- Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 90
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown what would you change Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer 70
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying. 50
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 58
- Which of the following activities do you think will be the most beneficial to the environment 1 Commute by biking or walking 2 Recycling 3 Eating a vegan diet 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...by an American painter called Whistler. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... most renowned paintings. In the article,it is said that the woman is the painting ...
^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the woman in “Symphony in the White” and the usage of monochromatic black, gr...
^^
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rey colours were the most popular things back then. Finally, the author posits t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 10.4613686534 249% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 30.3222958057 165% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 367.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92098092643 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77317808151 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452316076294 0.540411800872 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5203061994 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149670607056 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542807214489 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365448190069 0.0662205650399 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809325868781 0.162205337803 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04430520021 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.