Tpo 32 integrated
This set of the material in the both reading and lecture is about the strange sound, which can be heard by Russian submarines in North Atlantic and Arctic Ocean, called "quackers". The reading provides three pieces of evidence indicating that such odd sound could be produced by three various sounds. The lecturer, nonetheless, mentions that all the author's theories are unconvincing and refutes them by offering three counterclaims.
First, the passage posits that this sound might be originated from the calls of female and male ocra whales since researchers have found them around the submarines. In contrast, the professor takes this view that if ocra whales produced such odd noise, they would swim at the bottom of sea where the submarines are patrolling. Thus, because these whales are living near the surfaces of oceans, submarines cannot hear their sounds.
Second, the reading brings up this view that although there have not been enough accurate study to find precise behaviors of giant squid, they could be another candidate for creating such strange noises due to complex structures of their brains. On the other hand, the speaker disputes this point by arguing that this sound was heard from 1960s until 1980s. From 1980s till now, nobody has heard that noise while giant squids have been living the same area. As a result, there is no reason for giant squid to suddenly stop its noise.
Third, the reading sheds light on this fact that it is likely that such noise to be created by military technolohy such as other foreign submarines. The professor cast doubt on this point due to the fact that no advanced technology has been accomplished by reserachers to invent such silent and agile submarines. While it was reported such noise was able to change its direction quickly nad silently.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2015-11-05 | patel dolly | 90 | view |
2016-10-20 | Soshanill | 60 | view |
- tpo.20 integrated 70
- tpo1. integratedI have no mp3 file of this task, because I listen to it through software. 70
- tpo27. integrated 80
- 67. Young people nowadays do not respect their teachers as much as they did in the past. 30
- 63 Universities should spend more money on improving facilities eg labs and general equipment than on hiring famous professors 83
Comments
Dear teacher, Is not there
Dear teacher,
Is not there any grammatical mistake within this sentence?
although there have not been enough accurate study to find precise behaviors of giant squid, they could be another candidate for creating such strange noises due to complex structures of their brains.
between: there have not been & study
between: giant squid and they (that follows giant squid)?
After I submit my essay, I have noticed I must write studies and it because of have and giant squid respectively.
thanks a lot.
Dear teacher, Is not there
Dear teacher,
Is not there any grammatical mistake within this sentence?
although there have not been enough accurate study to find precise behaviors of giant squid, they could be another candidate for creating such strange noises due to complex structures of their brains.
between: there have not been & study
between: giant squid and they (that follows giant squid)?
After I submit my essay, I have noticed I must write studies and it because of have and giant squid respectively.
thanks a lot.
study here means 'research',
study here means 'research', so it doesn't need to be 'studies'.
'of giant squid, they...' is OK too since you didn't put 'a' in front of 'giant squid' as 'of a giant squid, they'
Sentence: Third, the reading sheds light on this fact that it is likely that such noise to be created by military technolohy such as other foreign submarines.
Error: technolohy Suggestion: technology
Sentence: The professor cast doubt on this point due to the fact that no advanced technology has been accomplished by reserachers to invent such silent and agile submarines.
Error: reserachers Suggestion: researchers
Sentence: While it was reported such noise was able to change its direction quickly nad silently.
Error: nad Suggestion: No alternate word
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 26 in 30
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 13 12
No. of Words: 300 250
No. of Characters: 1471 1200
No. of Different Words: 176 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.162 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.903 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.321 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 66 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.077 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.184 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.769 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.333 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.584 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4