“Over time, the costs of processing go down because as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. In color film processing, for example, the cost of a 3-by-5 inch print fell from 50 cents for five-day service in 1970 to 20 cents for one-day service in 1984. The same principle applies to the processing of food. And since Olympic Foods will soon celebrate its 25th birthday, we can expect that our long experience will enable us to minimize costs and thus maximize profits”
The author argues that the costs of processing go down because organizations have learned to do things better over time, and become more efficient. Therefore, a company named Olympic Foods is expected to minimize costs and maximize profits since it’s about to celebrate its 25th birthday. The argument is not well reasoned since it is based on a questionable assumption, fails to consider alternative explanations and uses an awkward analogy of color film to processed food.
First, the author assumes that through the accumulation of time, a company is supposed to acquire valuable experience that optimizes its processing procedure and reduces the costs of processing. However, the long history of an organization is not the absolute indicator of its success in cost reduction. Some start-up companies have made themselves more competitive and efficient than long-established corporations because of more flexible managerial methods and open-mined attitude toward new technology, which leads to higher efficiency.
Second, in addition to the experience brought about over time, the author has failed to consider other reasons that may decrease the costs of processing. For example, the lower costs on raw materials and human resources can both result in the reduced costs of manufacturing. Therefore, the author should take other factors that could influence costs and profits into account instead of focusing on one single reason.
In addition, it’s awkward to compare the example of color-film industry in cost reduction to that of processed food industry. Color-film industry may rely more on new technology to produce significant profit gains, while processed food industry, since its technology is quite mature already, could depend more on the low prices of raw materials. Thus, comparing two different industries to reach a shared conclusion makes the argument less convincing.
In conclusion, though the argument may seem reasonable at the first glance, it actually contains many reasoning errors. If the author managed to avoid the flaws mentioned above, the argument could have been more persuasive and effective.
- Some people prefer to work for themselves or own a business. Others prefer to work for an employer. Would you rather be self-employed, work for someone else, or own a business? Use specific reasons to explain your choice. 60
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 96
- “The failing revenues that the company is experiencing coincide with delays in manufacturing. These delays, in turn, are due in large part to poor planning in purchasing metals. Consider further that the manager of the department that handles purchasing o 70
- Has technology made the world better? 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 326 350
No. of Characters: 1763 1500
No. of Different Words: 186 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.249 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.408 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.843 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 83 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.404 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.857 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.345 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.622 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5