Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.
Why do you think this is happening?
What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?
It is true that rubbish is becoming one of the major factors that negatively affects the environment. There are a variety of possible reasons for this, but some measures can definitely be taken to tackle this problem.
A significant amount of rubbish being produced is positively correlated with an increase in consumption. People are buying more consumer goods these days. All goods contain packaging that must be disposed of after the items are purchased. Also, when consumers buy a new product, the old one is usually thrown away. At the same time, many people lack the perception of the consequences of producing the vast amount of waste that it has a detrimental effect on the environment, causing climate change and poisoning oceans. These three factors explain the substantial growth in the amount of rubbish being produced. The problem will deteriorate if the packaging and the old products are non-recyclable.
To address this issue, governments should legislate to reduce both consumption and packaging. Firstly, by adding an environmental tax to the cost of items, consumers would be less likely to purchase goods unless they were a necessity. As a result, this would slow down the rapid growth in unnecessary consumption. Secondly, governments could place more responsibility on producers to use more environmentally friendly packaging. Thus, this would reduce the impact on the environment. Finally, providing the public with better education could prevent the excessive waste being produced. For example, educated people would try to reduce, re-use or recycle as much rubbish as they can because they understand the value of reducing waste.
In conclusion, more and more rubbish will be produced unless governments exercise their power to control the negative effects on the environment with the use of taxes, laws and education.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-06 | jvalpatel | 73 | view |
2019-01-03 | kaka singh | 67 | view |
2018-04-18 | Diogo Silva | 84 | view |
2018-02-24 | jackwings923 | 89 | view |
2017-06-11 | sappu | 73 | view |
- Government spending should only be focused on public services, and it is a waste of money to spend on arts(eg. painting or music)to what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- The line graph shows Paris Metro station passengers Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 90
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000 The total budget was AED 315 billion 93
flaws:
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
for example:
A significant amount of rubbish being produced is positively correlated with an increase in consumption. People are buying more consumer goods these days. All goods contain packaging that must be disposed of after the items are purchased. Also, when consumers buy a new product, the old one is usually thrown away.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 291 350
No. of Characters: 1517 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.13 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.213 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.862 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 61 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.118 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.953 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.647 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.295 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.48 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.022 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5