Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.

Essay topics:

Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.

Some people believe that universities should put stringent policies in place that require students to take courses only within a chosen field of study, thus harshly limiting the breadth of knowledge that they are able to study. Concentrating on only one field is important in terms of developing expert knowledge and specialization, but it is also crucial that the student hone a well rounded knowledge of the nature of the world so that their field of specialization is accented with courses from outside disciplines as well. It is for this reason that I believe that students should focus their study on a specific field yet also be allowed and encouraged to accent and expand their specialized knowledge by sampling courses from other areas of specialty as well.

Our current globalizing world contains diversity of knowledge, culture and creed that is increasing at a rapid pace and in order to succeed in a world such as this, it is necessary to hone a diverse skill set of knowledge and expertise. Therefore, university policies should encourage students to accent their study of a specific discipline with outside courses that will enhance the breadth of their knowledge about the nature of the world. A student studying medicine, for example, clearly needs to focus the majority of their time on understanding the inner workings of the human body on a scientific level. However, it is also crucial for them to have a more general knowledge of the way in which humans function on an individual or cultural scale (i.e. psychology and anthropology), because effective doctors are not simply capable of diagnosing diseases, but can also interact effectively, with individual and cultural sensitivies, with their patients in order to provide the most well-rounded care. A mathematician who knows only about math and knows nothing about the ancient civilizations whose cultures discovered geography will be ill-suited to make math interesting to his future students or to understand the real world implications of the equations he slaves over daily. A one-dimensional course of study will only serve to foster bias and an uncritical approach to life in such students. Thus, because we live in a world that is multi-faceted, it is important for every specialist to learn a bit about specialities outside of their main discipline in order to augment their understanding of the world at large.

When universities provide a structure of encouragement for their students to augment their specified studies by selecting some courses from outside their discipline, there are some possible consequences, such as the potential for students to change their mind about what they want to focus on. Some may say this is an inefficient use of time and that it will confuse students. However, I would argue that it will foster a wider breadth of knowledge that is ultimately beneficial for any student; a student that started studying biology but then switched to psychology, for example, will always appreciate and pay heed to the importance of our life sciences and will not neglect to consider how the functions of the body may affect someone’s mental health. The existence of knowledge in a wider range of disciplines will only provide the student with more information with which to take charge in a world that is highly complex and rapidly changing all the time, and so allowing them to experiment a little and change their mind once or twice is to their benefit rather than to their detriment.

In conclusion, I disagree that universities should require students to take courses only within their specific, chosen field of study. When students are able to focus their study on one specific topic but then augment it by sampling courses from other disciplines, their knowledge becomes more wide ranging and interdisciplinary, thus providing a better foundation for them to succeed in a rapidly globalizing world. While they may change their minds as to their preferred topic of study one or two times, they will ultimately succeed by having a wide breadth of knowledge that will teach them to approach the world without a subject specific bias. Overall, it is best that universities allow their students to take courses outside of their chosen course of study in order to diversify their pallate of knowledge.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-06 zzk81 50 view
2019-12-06 zzk81 50 view
2019-11-20 ryuha 83 view
2019-11-08 roudabehvm16 66 view
2019-11-07 Dhruv_gre 66 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: Overall, it is best that universities allow their students to take courses outside of their chosen course of study in order to diversify their pallate of knowledge.
Error: pallate Suggestion: palate

flaws:
The essay is a little bit off the topic. It is '...fields they are interested in studying.' , not fields 'they are able to study. ' or 'universities should require students to take courses only within their specific, chosen field of study.'

No. of Words: 706 350 //Write the essay in 30 minutes. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.

----------------------

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 706 350
No. of Characters: 3547 1500
No. of Different Words: 287 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 5.155 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.024 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.847 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 246 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 208 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 137 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 93 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 39.222 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.497 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.364 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.528 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.152 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5