Question is in the picture.
The line graph elucidates the consumption of three different types of fast food by Australian teenagers between 1975 and 2000. The units are measured in the number of times eaten per year.
Overall, it is clearly seen from the graph that the major changes have been taken places with the fast food preference by Australian juveniles. The number of hamburger and pizza that were eaten increased dramatically for the given periods while the consumption for fish and chips declined.
In the beginning of the period, the most popular fast food in Australia was fish and chips, being eaten 100 times a year. This was far higher than pizza and hamburgers, which were consumed approximately 5 times a year. However, the consumption on fish and chips fluctuated from 100 to about 85 for the following 10 years and then it gradually decreased over the 25 years of time scale to finish at just under 40 times per year. Meanwhile, the Australian teenagers’ preference on pizza rose steadily from the beginning of the period to 1995. It reached a peak of approximately at 82 in 1995.
Between 1985 and 1995, the decrease in the preference of fish and chips was at a much faster rate than in the beginning of the periods. It fell to the lowest point by 2000 at below 40. The number of times eaten for hamburgers per year by Australian adolescents was at its highest level of 100 in 1995.
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 70
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday. 100
- The pie charts below describe average household expenditures by major categories in Japan and Malaysia in 2010. 30
- The bar chart below shows figures of annual coffee and meat consumption 56
- The chart below gives information about the UK's ageing population in 1985 and makes predictions for 2035.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 60
flaws:
The last paragraph should talk more on hamburgers.
Need some comparisons between hamburgers and pizzas. Because the lines are relatively similar.
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 10
No. of Words: 242 200
No. of Characters: 1110 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.944 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.587 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.583 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 48 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.647 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.167 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.386 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.586 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.049 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4