The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil.
"Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season, that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters predict that this weather pattern will continue for several more years. Furthermore, many new homes are being built in the region in response to recent population growth. Because of these trends, we can safely predict that this region will experience an increased demand for heating oil during the next five years."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The author of the memo predicts that region will experience an enhancement of demand for heating oil during next five years; this prediction is buttressed by evidence which ought to be questioned in order to give a comprehensive evaluation of the soundness of the prediction.
To begin with, the writer claims that previous season had 90 days with temperature below normal but how much below average the temperature was? Perhaps, the temperature was only a couple of degree below the average, thus this deviation cannot possibly seriously impact on people's behavior. What is more, in reality even if we accept for granted that the temperature was seriously below average, for instance by 10 degree, there is no guarantee that people changed their conduct, probably, they started to wear more clothes at home to avoid burning additional fuel. Consequently, the usage of this data is questionable.
Secondly, we know that forecasters predict that the pattern will proceed for several more years; however, weather predictions are often not precise in particular when we have a deal with such a huge for forecast time span as several years. Additionally to it, even if the prediction is accurate, we do not know how much below the temperature will be, the writer’s assumption that this predicted anomaly will be severe is not supported and thus the deviation may be mild as well. As a result, the author's belief in the reliability and usefulness of the forecast is unreasonable.
Thirdly, we are told that many new homes are being erected in the region; however, those new homes may have decent insulation which dramatically reduces usage of oil or they may use alternative and more efficient methods of heating, for instance, by electricity. Moreover, although those homes are being built now, we cannot be sure that people will buy them; the probability exists that an economic crisis takes place in the region and those novel houses will be unbought and abandoned. In other words, the usage of this evidence is dubious as well.
Finally, it is predicted that region will experience an increase in demand for oil during the next five years, at the same time the used evidence is infirm. What is more, why should we believe that the demand will be growing during next five years? Perhaps the increase will last for three or one year, in other words, this writer's statement is not supported by information given.
In conclusion, the originator of the memo avers that because of an anomaly cold previous season and forecast the demand for heating oil will surely increase, at the same time, the given data does not directly create a strong support for this stance, consequently, the predictions is weak and unreliable.
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 63
- It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are generated and preserved.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developin 50
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 80
- You have enough money to purchase either a house or a business Which would you choose to buy Give specific reasons to explain your choice 83
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
Sentence: Moreover, although those homes are being built now, we cannot be sure that people will buy them; the probability exists that an economic crisis takes place in the region and those novel houses will be unbought and abandoned.
Error: unbought Suggestion: No alternate word
----------------
argument 1 -- OK. but more: maybe other days are above-normal temperatures.
argument 2 -- should be put in argument 1:
Last heating season, that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters predict that this weather pattern will continue for several more years.
and better to accept that 'this weather pattern will continue for several more years'
argument 3 -- OK
argument 4 -- OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 453 350
No. of Characters: 2208 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.613 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.874 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 153 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 114 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.412 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.933 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.64 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.158 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5