Sidney opera house
The reading passage is about the Sydney Opera House which was designed by Jorn Utzon, a Danish architect, in 1956. He was selected between 230 architecture. His work was more like a sculpture than a building because its’ shape was changed according to the direction from which it was viewed. He claimed that the structure was according to organic principles. The Opera House was look like a sailing ship; in addition, a 200 feet high of roof which was the most revolutionized part of the structure changed it to a big challenge. The complexity and financial problems, causes this project was not finished up to 1973.
In the lecture, the professor stated that the Sydney Opera House is a master work because it is a unique structure which does not fit in any architectural category. First of all, it was designed and built based on new technologies so, it has qualities of modern building in that time but we cannot count its shape as an international one because it is imaginative. Secondly, although the shape of Sydney Opera House is like a ship in harbor, its function is not organic. Thirdly, we can count this building as a high-tech structure which is blend of art, architecture, engineering, and technology.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo1 76
- Turing test 73
- the fossils of T.rex 73
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'look', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'in addition', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252136752137 0.261695866417 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.15811965812 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0598290598291 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0470085470085 0.0435111971325 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0555555555556 0.0277247811725 200% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123931623932 0.128828473217 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0470085470085 0.0370669169778 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9022757617 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.017094017094 0.0208969081088 82% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.115384615385 0.128158765124 90% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00854700854701 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0213675213675 0.0114777025283 186% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1222.0 1645.83664459 74% => OK
No of words: 209.0 271.125827815 77% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84688995215 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04852973271 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.320574162679 0.374372842146 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263157894737 0.287516216867 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.196172248804 0.187439937562 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138755980861 0.113142543107 123% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9022757617 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55980861244 0.539623497131 104% => OK
Word variations: 51.8194995921 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9 21.7502111507 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2731023382 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.2 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 21.7502111507 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.09492273731 49% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 47.2157894737 50.5018328374 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.62295081967 1.90840788429 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108982787349 0.451937469235 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.12336822193 0.142949733639 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0553276955454 0.0787303798458 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.53859146886 0.631733273073 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.116393902395 0.139662658121 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557916041924 0.21790590567 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697593335342 0.0871468918476 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389522342992 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0530846634433 0% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940528371148 0.332364718235 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00587464927676 0.0446026805963 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 73.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.