Do you agree or disagree:
people learn things from those in their own level than from those at a higher level
When it comes to the learning, there are vast variety of effective factors that should be considered. The teacher or in other word, a person who teaches, also must have some critical characteristics to be accepted as a great one. Personally, I have always learned better from my classmates than my teachers. There are three main reasons to show why I have this preference.
First and foremost, all too often, there are the same outlook for two classmates or co-workers to the problems which it is made them to have the same perception of matters. Therefore, they explanation for one solution would be more understandable for another one. I remember when I was studying in the university, I had a friend with I studied most of the time. Whenever I had any problem in the lesson which had been thought by the professor, I have asked her to explain it to me and her explanation would be more effective than the teachers'.
Another prominent reason, it has been said that, if you want to be an excellent teacher, have to consider yourself at the same level that your students are. Actually, if you look the learners from above, the things that is thought, will not be comprehensible. For example, I have an intelligent bother who is very clever but he never could explain my math problems in an easy way which could be acceptable for me, because, he always looks at matters from his point of view but not mine.
Last but not least, there are more trust between two friends or colleagues rather than between a person from lower level and higher authority and it leads to more impact on each other. For instance, if employees have some problems, they would prefer to ask their co-workers to explain about them but not their managers. Because they assume their colleagues in the same level and they know these questions would not affect the colleagues' perception of them.
To sum up, some factors such as same outlooks to the problems, being under the same circumstances, and more trust will cause to learning better from those who are at their own peoples' level than those at the higher levels.
- jet stream 70
- do you agree or disagree with this statementthe extended family is now less important than it was in the past. 76
- do you agree or disagree with this statementthere will be fewer cars in use in twenty years 73
- good teachers set challenging tasks for students. 70
- Do you agree or disagree:A person should never make an important decision alone. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... one. Personally, I have always learned better from my classmates than my teachers. Th...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'outlooks'?
Suggestion: outlooks
...most, all too often, there are the same outlook for two classmates or co-workers to the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... be more effective than the teachers. Another prominent reason, it has been sa...
^^^
Line 5, column 366, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...he never could explain my math problems in an easy way which could be acceptable for me, becau...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colleagues'' or 'colleague's'?
Suggestion: colleagues'; colleague's
...ow these questions would not affect the colleagues perception of them. To sum up, some...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
..., and more trust will cause to learning better from those who are at their own peoples...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.160098522167 0.229887763892 70% => OK
Verbs: 0.160098522167 0.158761421928 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788177339901 0.0866891130778 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0566502463054 0.046263068375 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0960591133005 0.0685040099705 140% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.110837438424 0.118717715034 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0295566502463 0.0351676179071 84% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.63701380606 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0369458128079 0.0309702414327 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00246305418719 0.00188951952338 130% => OK
Determiners: 0.0911330049261 0.0887237588012 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0246305418719 0.0209618222197 118% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0295566502463 0.0139019557991 213% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2103.0 2387.08602151 88% => OK
No of words: 367.0 408.028673835 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73024523161 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48200974243 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.286103542234 0.338922669872 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223433242507 0.251872472559 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160762942779 0.174417080927 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106267029973 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63701380606 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525885558583 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 57.1648624749 59.2087087015 97% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4666666667 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6120952994 48.84282405 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.2 120.699889404 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.644075263715 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.54480286738 108% => OK
Readability: 46.8099909173 45.7405998639 102% => OK
Elegance: 0.96062992126 1.45489161554 66% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164008926994 0.300154397459 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10193709514 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.070110874855 0.0752933317313 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.551359627733 0.497263757937 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157955581908 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621744415407 0.114077575197 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06049252776 0.0781384742642 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.258019008873 0.336927656856 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0447721899532 0.067059652881 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116415209008 0.210909579961 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0715935429751 0.0618886996521 116% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8870967742 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.