Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us. Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized.
There is a well known saying in the field of science, ‘your knowledge of the world can be seen as an expanding circle.’ The more you know, the more you’ll realize you don’t know. We must not be afraid of unknown. Expanding our understanding of the world and revealing the unknown complexity are two critical roles of science that complement each other like Yin and Yang, growing from each other and enhancing each other.
Realising our lack of understanding to the complexity of the world is the very first step to asking a good research question. No scientific research ever came from a complacent and satiated mind that overlook the gaps in our current knowledge. Discovering an important gap in our understanding of the world and asking the right question is as important as if not more than the actual laborious process of seeking the answer. If Galileo had not realised the complexity of universe beyond the explanation of an earth-centred world, there would not be rapid expansion of knowledge in the field of astronomy. Another example is that by revealing the limitation of classical Newtonian physics and realising the complexity unexplained by it, the field of physics is revolutionized by the foundation of the study of quantum physics. This will not be possible if scientists have not first realised the mysterious intricacy involved in the movement of particles.
Science discoveries also never cease to expand our understanding of the world surrounding us. By answering endless research questions, we started to unravel the complexity associated with our own body with the study of physiology and neuroscience, our interaction with the society with psychology, our interactions with the environment with ecology and environmental science. This curiosity does not satiate itself, and our mind is not ever replete with knowledge. Existing findings inspire us to pin-point gaps in knowledge and ask more informed questions which again await answers. They also prompt us to see the connections between disciplines, and propose interesting question on a larger scope. Currently, we can be quite confident with our understanding of the basic principals in chemistry, yet by applying this thorough knowledge to biology, a new field of protein engineering is created.
It is crucial for a researcher to understand and embrace the circle of life of science. A question leads to an answer, which nurtures 10 other questions. This is how science grow, and this is exactly why science never strops growing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | salamikehinde | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | Cursed God | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | roudabehvm16 | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | shahryar2222 | 54 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | gbhardwa | 33 | view |
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers 85
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 58
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 84
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.Write a res 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[1]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'unknowns'.
Suggestion: unknowns
...ou don’t know. We must not be afraid of unknown. Expanding our understanding of the wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 768, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[2]
Message: Did you mean 'basic principles' (=rule)?
Suggestion: basic principles
...confident with our understanding of the basic principals in chemistry, yet by applying this thor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'well', 'you know']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22850678733 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.158371040724 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0927601809955 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0542986425339 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.052036199095 0.0444667217837 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133484162896 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0633484162896 0.0406280797675 156% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04273336957 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0203619909502 0.030933414821 66% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.119909502262 0.0997080785238 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0113122171946 0.0249443105267 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0113122171946 0.0148568991511 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2528.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 406.0 452.878318584 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22660098522 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374384236453 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.339901477833 0.280924506359 121% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256157635468 0.200843997647 128% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.179802955665 0.132149295362 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04273336957 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 219.290929204 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519704433498 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 58.0721994692 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5555555556 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2347457635 59.4972553346 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.444444444 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.388888888889 0.674092028746 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 56.5457033388 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.60683760684 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315453393101 0.391690518653 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.103564616255 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0708252026302 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.539346078951 0.547984918172 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.163517130723 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127732421316 0.161403998019 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661914099928 0.0892212321368 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.410085276467 0.385218514788 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10507858845 0.0692045440612 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205283118715 0.275328986314 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510125079262 0.0653680567796 78% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.