TPO 15,Cane toads
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about three means of stopping spread of cane toads in Australia. Considering this, the reading consider these methods effective. The professor, on the other hand, not only reputes the author's assessments, but also asserts that the announced option runs counter to the way the reading just argued. The lecture, demonstrates three reasons to reject points in the reading.
The first criticism of the passage against which the lecture argues is that construction a national fence will prevent cane toads from moving to not colonized part of Australia. As stated by the professor, building a national fence is not effective due to the fact that toads' eggs and young toads can be found in water; so, the can carry with the follow of water to different sides, and it is easy for them to establish a new habitat for themselves. Hence, establishing cannot stop spreading cane toads.
Moreover, unlike the passage which claims that cane toads can be voluntarily deteriorated, the professor illustrates that even though capturing and destroying cane toads by volunteers can be successful, it can endangers native frogs who are similar to toad in young age.
Finally, the lecture contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the virus developed by researchers can avoid cane toads form maturing and reproducing, saying that using a virus can be terrible and have serious effect on cane toad’s original habitat because some Australian reptiles and amphibians are transferred to other countries by researchers, which can be cause the spread the virus in cane toads original habitat, in the South America, and endangers them. Cane toads are part of American ecosystem, destroying them will be caused an ecological disaster in South America ecosystem.
All in all, the professor maintains that the three measures offered in the passage are likely either to be unsuccessful, or will adversely affect environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Shayooooon | 85 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job. 80
- successful people try new things and takes risks. 78
- TPO 15,Cane toads 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...asons to reject points in the reading. The first criticism of the passage against ...
^^^
Line 2, column 349, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... found in water; so, the can carry with the follow of water to different sides, and it is ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'endanger'
Suggestion: endanger
...by volunteers can be successful, it can endangers native frogs who are similar to toad in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...her countries by researchers, which can be cause the spread the virus in cane toads orig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., or will adversely affect environment.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252808988764 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.165730337079 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0814606741573 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393258426966 0.0435111971325 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0168539325843 0.0277247811725 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115168539326 0.128828473217 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0561797752809 0.0370669169778 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.83100353172 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0252808988764 0.0208969081088 121% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.11797752809 0.128158765124 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0337078651685 0.0158828679856 212% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0112359550562 0.0114777025283 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1963.0 1645.83664459 119% => OK
No of words: 316.0 271.125827815 117% => OK
Chars per words: 6.21202531646 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370253164557 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294303797468 0.287516216867 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.215189873418 0.187439937562 115% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155063291139 0.113142543107 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83100353172 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553797468354 0.539623497131 103% => OK
Word variations: 58.8902578173 53.8517498576 109% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 28.7272727273 21.7502111507 132% => OK
Sentence length SD: 115.77157618 49.3711431718 234% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 178.454545455 132.220823453 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7272727273 21.7502111507 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 0.878197800319 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.39072847682 147% => OK
Readability: 58.1576524741 50.5018328374 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.91139240506 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.750459857544 0.451937469235 166% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.157744249578 0.142949733639 110% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0987661113006 0.0787303798458 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.694612720449 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.239854250147 0.139662658121 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.353416639084 0.21790590567 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15023909937 0.0871468918476 172% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392844853311 0.414875509568 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0780540483425 0.0530846634433 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.501396009856 0.332364718235 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103539162853 0.0446026805963 232% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.