"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose
views contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
Learning is a process that is expedited through many ways like books, internet, experiences, etc. Learning from people is one of the most efficient way and due to its interactive nature it is fastest way of understanding the things. Homosapiens are intelligent species and it is bound to happen that we are going to have some view point on any thing we are learning. The view points can obviously vary from person to person and hence play its role on "how much we learn from that person".
The psychology of a person is going to play an important role in how that person learn from other person if other one is sharing or contradicting viewpoints. For example, if a person is rational thinker and drives his learning solely from critical analysis and logic without being dogmatic. For such person it doesn't matter whether other one is sharing or contradicting his view point unless he explains everything rationally. On the other hand, a highly opinionated person is never going to entertain a blatant contradiction. A feeling of stress may inhibit his/her learning in this case. Also position of a person is also going to play an important role. If a student is having some viewpoint over a topic being learnt and even if teacher is has contradictory viewpoint with nominal reasons then learning of student is not going to be impacted a lot. On the other hand, reverse case of this that a student posing valid reasons for change in viewpoints of teacher may inhibit teacher's learning.
However, a person sharing same viewpoints may have same logical support that other one is having and there is less scope for one to think in other directions and thus learning may be inhibited. One contradicting one's viewpoint always tend to challenge to ponder both his and opponent's viewpoints to analyse and in this case there are higher scopes of learning. The best example that can be presented is of Galileeo's theory that earth revolves round the sun rather vice-versa. In that era, all people if share same viewpoint that sun revolves around the sun then our learning about solar system would not be like today it is. Same viewpoint learning can be corroborated in a way that if one is going to make learn who are at greater positions or are more aged, then rather being completely contradicting his/view point one can put his/her viewpoint in a way that is weaving minute contradictions over facade of same viewpoint. This will not sound like total disagreement and also contradicting points could be put. But for the obvious facts like sun revolving around the earth, it is very difficult to create such a facade and bolstering such learning will be inane.
Debate, constructive contradictions, and data based beliefs have made it possible to develop in a way we are today. Learning should never compromised with human emotions. If certain facts are presented with proper reasoning, then it shouldn't matter what viewpoints one has whether same or contradicting. This should apply to all individuals irrespective of their positions or age. There are numerous examples in history that show if people would be sharing same viewpoints then revolutionary learning like earth revolving around sun would not be feasible and should not relate correct knowledge with emotions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-17 | Munaim Hossain | 66 | view |
| 2017-10-28 | zenith222 | 83 | view |
| 2016-09-11 | abhishek1702 | 16 | view |
| 2016-07-27 | ujjwalkrpl | 16 | view |
| 2016-07-14 | YASH14 | 16 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge andexperience to that field of study 50
- Success, whether academic or professional, involves an ability to survive in a newenvironment and--, eventually, --to change it 62
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus 50
- 'Moderation in all things' is ill-considered advice. Rather, one should say, 'Moderation in mostthings,' since many areas of human concern require or at least profit from intense focus' 45
- The material progress and well-being of one country are necessarily connected to thematerial progress and well-being of all other countries 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the fastest'.
Suggestion: is the fastest
...ay and due to its interactive nature it is fastest way of understanding the things. Homosa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...we are going to have some view point on any thing we are learning. The view points can ob...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hout being dogmatic. For such person it doesnt matter whether other one is sharing or ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... inhibit his/her learning in this case. Also position of a person is also going to p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ing may be inhibited. One contradicting ones viewpoint always tend to challenge to p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pondering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: pondering
...ones viewpoint always tend to challenge to ponder both his and opponents viewpoints to an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...resented with proper reasoning, then it shouldnt matter what viewpoints one has whether ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
... viewpoints then revolutionary learning like earth revolving around sun would not be...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'for example', 'in fact', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228040540541 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.204391891892 0.157235817809 130% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0962837837838 0.0880659088768 109% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0472972972973 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0337837837838 0.0444667217837 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123310810811 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0777027027027 0.0406280797675 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.82134604348 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.027027027027 0.030933414821 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0726351351351 0.0997080785238 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0287162162162 0.0249443105267 115% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0135135135135 0.0148568991511 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3285.0 2732.02544248 120% => OK
No of words: 549.0 452.878318584 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98360655738 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84053189512 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353369763206 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255009107468 0.280924506359 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180327868852 0.200843997647 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129326047359 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82134604348 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.48968727796 91% => OK
Word variations: 52.1601954987 55.4138127331 94% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 22.875 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6076758697 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.875 141.124799967 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.674092028746 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 48.3759107468 51.4728631049 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.50295857988 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142550035597 0.391690518653 36% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119695054511 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0974937194708 0.077325440228 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.452576844391 0.547984918172 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.107598319545 0.149214159877 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503135339681 0.161403998019 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573563806922 0.0892212321368 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.414371041676 0.385218514788 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0436583558492 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106770380022 0.275328986314 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687662746743 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.