Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
Nowadays, no one can deny the importance of technology. Some people may hold the opinion that technology causes to less creative among children. But others have a negative attitude. As far as I am concerned, I disagree with this statement because, obviously, development in technology has many advantages in creative ability in children that we cannot ignore them. I will try to examine below the specific reasons for my opinion according to which I think are the most common viewpoints these days.
First let us look at what children can typically gain from a technology. In fact technology has many benefits in learning process of children and children who learn more has more creative. By way of illustration, today we have many educational websites and television channels that encourage children to learn more and more and it is very useful and helpful for them. Educational programs have assorted strategies, including new teaching methods and new psychological facts that can bring many major merits for children.
There is also a more subtle point we must consider. It goes without saying that, large diversity of games cause children learns more creative things. Unlike the past that people only play constrictive number plays, today children have many plays such as computer games, Lego and video games. Take my younger brother for example, when we ask he about many different situations, he has answer to all of them, but when I was young as he I did not what I could do.
Finally, I cannot oversee the fact that using technology by children also means thinking about this technology and it means that they practice their mind and every psychologist claim that if children ponder more about ideas and concepts, they have stronger creative in their life. To shed more light on the issue, according to the result of the study done in Tehran University children in every decade have a better creative than children in a past decade because they have to contemplate about more technology around them in the past. For instance, when I was child I always thought about create animation and it not only made me creative person, but also helped me to ponder about other things that I saw.
Drawing upon the reasons, although there are always some exceptions which are excluded from the general rule, I do agree that benefits of technology in its impact on creative in children. To recapitulate the reasons, not only technology makes children more creative than past, but also let them to learn more things in their life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-27 | daniel8564 | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...other for example, when we ask he about many different situations, he has answer to all of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'answered'.
Suggestion: answered
...about many different situations, he has answer to all of them, but when I was young as...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'i think', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225806451613 0.229887763892 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.154838709677 0.158761421928 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103225806452 0.0866891130778 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0559139784946 0.046263068375 121% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0860215053763 0.0685040099705 126% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.133333333333 0.118717715034 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0258064516129 0.0351676179071 73% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61252135304 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0236559139785 0.0309702414327 76% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.058064516129 0.0887237588012 65% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0193548387097 0.0209618222197 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0215053763441 0.0139019557991 155% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2532.0 2387.08602151 106% => OK
No of words: 425.0 408.028673835 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95764705882 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334117647059 0.338922669872 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251764705882 0.251872472559 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209411764706 0.174417080927 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110588235294 0.112833075102 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61252135304 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527058823529 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 60.1666359554 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6111111111 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8540859864 48.84282405 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.666666667 120.699889404 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6111111111 20.5533526081 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.644075263715 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 48.7875816993 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.29710144928 1.45489161554 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328435969929 0.300154397459 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.076839149697 0.103427244359 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.080289922454 0.0752933317313 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498369869893 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159701279541 0.151897553556 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114005487335 0.114077575197 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917867490165 0.0781384742642 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.278773756949 0.336927656856 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0775181756332 0.067059652881 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210147659845 0.210909579961 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907195099689 0.0618886996521 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.