tpo7

Essay topics:

tpo7

The reading and the lecture are both about certification to wood companies, which is about accepting high ecological standards by protecting resource and using material that can be use after using. The author of reading believs that it is unlikely that wood companies will do the same. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made in the article. He thinks that there are good reasons for people to buy these products.

First of all, the author claims that there is so much advertising, and people usually do not believe that thay are trust about their products. This point is challenged by the lecture. He says that people can distinguish between these advertising programs, and recognize independent program than others.

Secondly, the authors states that if people decide to choose ecocertified products, it will be more expensive and it is not economical. This argument is rebutted by the lecture. He suggests this question; how does not care about the value of product? He elaborates on this mentioning that these product is not much more expensive than others, so people choose them because there is different small price.

Finally, the author mentions that certification would make sence for american wood compnies only if they marketed most of their products abroad. The lecture, on the other hand, feels that they have to pay attention to international markets.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-08-07 mgrajapt 60 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y that wood companies will do the same. The lecture casts doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this product' or 'these products'?
Suggestion: this product; these products
...? He elaborates on this mentioning that these product is not much more expensive than others,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.229838709677 0.261695866417 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.177419354839 0.158904122519 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0685483870968 0.0723426182421 95% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0645161290323 0.0435111971325 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0483870967742 0.0277247811725 175% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137096774194 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0362903225806 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65740146111 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201612903226 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0927419354839 0.128158765124 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0201612903226 0.0158828679856 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0120967741935 0.0114777025283 105% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1374.0 1645.83664459 83% => OK
No of words: 224.0 271.125827815 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.13392857143 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.357142857143 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28125 0.287516216867 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209821428571 0.187439937562 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129464285714 0.113142543107 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65740146111 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580357142857 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.4859813898 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2307692308 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3389876362 49.3711431718 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 132.220823453 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2307692308 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.878197800319 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 45.3557692308 50.5018328374 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.38888888889 1.90840788429 73% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0916285237718 0.142949733639 64% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.070631478062 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.548269816123 0.631733273073 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.142602101578 0.139662658121 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.312045005074 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108402958728 0.0530846634433 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.