Some people believe that the huge salaries paid to the movies, sports, and stars are not fair in compare to the salaries that other professionals like engineers, teachers, and doctors receive; however some others believe that the huge salaries in these sports and movie stars can completely justifiable. Discuss both ideas and introduce your own opinion.
Nowadays, the most main part of both people discussion and the mass media is relevant to whether salaries that are paid to various occupations are fair or not. Some people advocate that the huge salaries that are paid to the movies stars, sports are not fair in compare to the teeny salaries that are paid to the other occupations like engineers, teachers, doctors and so on; however, others people believe that these huge salaries that are paid are completely justifiable. Both ideas are elaborated below.
The first group believes that the huge salaries that are paid to the movies stars, sports and so on are unfair in compare to the teeny salaries that are paid to the other occupation. They claim that the teacher, doctor, engineer and so on can impress on their country progress and even adolescent generation upbringing but they receive teeny salaries. For example, teachers who educate the children should receive at least mediocre salary.
On the other hand, the second group believes that the huge salaries that are paid to sports, stars and so on are completely justifiable. They argue that although they receive huge salaries, they can create a considerable increase in employer's revenue. For example, they believe a movie star who is very famous should receive huge salary.
To my mind, the former idea is a right idea. Although movie stars, sports and so on can result in a considerable increase in employer's revenue, they may have a misleading impression on people that it is irrecoverable. Also teachers, doctors and engineers have positive impression on their country progress.
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 70
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-11 - Integrated Writing Task A recent study reveals that people especially young people are reading far less literature,novels, plays, and poems,than they used to. This is troubling because the trend has unfortunate effects for the reading public, for 60
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 60
- TPO 38 Integrated writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, the most main part of both peo...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able. Both ideas are elaborated below. The first group believes that the huge s...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould receive at least mediocre salary. On the other hand, the second group beli...
^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...very famous should receive huge salary. To my mind, the former idea is a right i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ion on people that it is irrecoverable. Also teachers, doctors and engineers have po...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'at least', 'for example', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251700680272 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.146258503401 0.158761421928 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.105442176871 0.0866891130778 122% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047619047619 0.046263068375 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0374149659864 0.0685040099705 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.102040816327 0.118717715034 86% => OK
Participles: 0.030612244898 0.0351676179071 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61823267347 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0340136054422 0.0309702414327 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0884353741497 0.0887237588012 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0204081632653 0.0209618222197 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.030612244898 0.0139019557991 220% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1615.0 2387.08602151 68% => OK
No of words: 264.0 408.028673835 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11742424242 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48200974243 90% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367424242424 0.338922669872 108% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284090909091 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208333333333 0.174417080927 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106060606061 0.112833075102 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61823267347 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454545454545 0.524397521467 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.1594980124 59.2087087015 71% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6684587814 58% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.3962859698 48.84282405 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.583333333 120.699889404 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.5533526081 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 0.644075263715 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 50.4090909091 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.66176470588 1.45489161554 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.686216255648 0.300154397459 229% => The coherence between essay topic and essay body is overfitting.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145305708904 0.103427244359 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.117786223798 0.0752933317313 156% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573190652669 0.497263757937 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194190334162 0.151897553556 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263811586872 0.114077575197 231% => Sentence topic similarity is too high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.234160589473 0.0781384742642 300% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.495059718945 0.336927656856 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.14040731696 0.067059652881 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.471157387929 0.210909579961 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182741392439 0.0618886996521 295% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 13.6433691756 37% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.