Topic 3: Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people food? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
We can look at the topic in two different views. Considering negative and positive effects of preparing food in an easy way can present my opinion. At the beginning, there are many families who both father and mother work out during the day so when they return to their homes they expect to prepare their foods immediately without any especial difficulty. They have varies choices.
First of all, they can call the restaurants up. It will takes a short time for them to receive their orders. It is a positive aspect of this preparation. On the other hand, let me consider negative aspect of this preparation. This may make some people lazy. The people who do not try to prepare their foods at all. This kind of people get attached to fast foods. Another reason that can be considered as a negative aspect of fast foods is being harmful to the bodies.
As a matter of fact, I could tell that this change has improved the way people food just if people look at the change in a proper way. The people who choose to eat their foods out of home when they are not able to prepare their foods at home or the ones who eat their foods out of home when they want to have fun are using the positive effects of this change. But the people whom this change has made them lazy are the ones who are using this easy preparation in a wrong way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-18 | davidarranow | 60 | view |
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws. 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sport (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 50
- For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symph 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- TPO-03 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an easy way" with adverb for "easy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... and positive effects of preparing food in an easy way can present my opinion. At the beginnin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'take'
Suggestion: take
...ey can call the restaurants up. It will takes a short time for them to receive their ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... food just if people look at the change in a proper way. The people who choose to eat their foo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...nes who are using this easy preparation in a wrong way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'kind of', 'as a matter of fact', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227611940299 0.229887763892 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.167910447761 0.158761421928 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0671641791045 0.0866891130778 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0186567164179 0.046263068375 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0783582089552 0.0685040099705 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111940298507 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0335820895522 0.0351676179071 95% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.20682639566 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0335820895522 0.0309702414327 108% => OK
Particles: 0.00373134328358 0.00188951952338 197% => OK
Determiners: 0.130597014925 0.0887237588012 147% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0261194029851 0.0209618222197 125% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0410447761194 0.0139019557991 295% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1333.0 2387.08602151 56% => OK
No of words: 249.0 408.028673835 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35341365462 5.86048508987 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.48200974243 89% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.248995983936 0.338922669872 73% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.14859437751 0.251872472559 59% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.0963855421687 0.174417080927 55% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0441767068273 0.112833075102 39% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.20682639566 2.67179642975 83% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 212.727598566 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526104417671 0.524397521467 100% => OK
Word variations: 50.1071306607 59.2087087015 85% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 16.6 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8927462049 48.84282405 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8666666667 120.699889404 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.5533526081 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.5376344086 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 31.459437751 45.7405998639 69% => OK
Elegance: 1.40845070423 1.45489161554 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280743347723 0.300154397459 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131682748324 0.103427244359 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0835263359112 0.0752933317313 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.458312077331 0.497263757937 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152974160971 0.151897553556 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102657413286 0.114077575197 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728476797503 0.0781384742642 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328764423861 0.336927656856 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0861297029604 0.067059652881 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202656013544 0.210909579961 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584333119048 0.0618886996521 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.