tpo 28
The reading provides three solid evidences to introduce the Robert Peary as the first person how reached the North Pole. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some reasons to refute them all.
First, the author argues that the National Geographic committee accept Peary`s claims based on investigating his records. Conversely the lecturer cast doubt on this idea by stating that the committee’s decision was not at all persuasive because one of the member of this committee was Peary`s close friend how financially advocate his trip. Moreover, she states that the examination process just tacked two days and they could not make an unbiased decision in this short time.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that it was possible for Peary to reach the North Pole in 37 days because other people such as Tom Avery did the same thing even in the shorter time. On the contrary the professor underlines the fact that the conditions of these two explorer were not the same. For example, Avery carried much less weight because the air planes dropped his food for him. Moreover, she argues that the weather condition when Peary went to the North Pole was quite different with the time when Avery did his trip.
Finally, the reading asserts that the height of the shadows in Peary`s photographs clearly depicts he was in the North pole. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that for estimating the Geographic location based on a picture we need a precise photograph. However, the Peary`s picture was taken by the primitive camera and they are too old. So, based on these bluer pictures, we cannot exactly determine was he tacked them in the North Pole or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 127, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...ims based on investigating his records. Conversely the lecturer cast doubt on this idea by...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['conversely', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'as to', 'for example', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267857142857 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.127976190476 0.158904122519 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0625 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0625 0.0435111971325 144% => OK
Pronouns: 0.047619047619 0.0277247811725 172% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113095238095 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0208333333333 0.0370669169778 56% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.58176020657 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.014880952381 0.0208969081088 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.142857142857 0.128158765124 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00595238095238 0.0158828679856 37% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119047619048 0.0114777025283 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1740.0 1645.83664459 106% => OK
No of words: 291.0 271.125827815 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9793814433 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04852973271 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3264604811 0.374372842146 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257731958763 0.287516216867 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175257731959 0.187439937562 94% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.109965635739 0.113142543107 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58176020657 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 59.5202909371 53.8517498576 111% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3846153846 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2788543922 49.3711431718 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.846153846 132.220823453 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 21.7502111507 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.1578112609 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.6875 1.90840788429 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.733585196599 0.549887131256 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120575185456 0.142949733639 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.061616681962 0.0787303798458 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.650979553771 0.631733273073 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117590935985 0.139662658121 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.36908363514 0.266732575781 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13879032276 0.103435571967 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.424606841959 0.414875509568 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113468470902 0.0530846634433 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.551025101687 0.40443939384 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815464550385 0.0528353158467 154% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.