“One should not expect respect for disregarding the opinions of others. Only when every point of view is taken into
consideration should people take action in the world.”
The speaker's claim is actually two fold: (1) Respect is not to be expected proper regard to the opinion of others is not given (2) Action is to be taken only after considering every point of view. However, I do not completely agree with the speaker on both claims.
Democracy can be viewed as the best example where the views and opinions of the people are considered before taking necessary action. Hence,it is natural to assume that the leader of the largest democratic country, India would receive immense respect and eulogy. However, the leaders are prone to criticism due to drawbacks that comes with a democracy. Consider the stray dog issue faced by the people of Kerala, a state in India. This issue is debated at a large scale and is celebrated by the media. The result of these debates are a plethora of opinions and even though immediate action is required, this action is delayed due to inability to arrive at a solution acceptable to everyone. When in a critical situation such as this, wasting crucial time on accessing the opinion of others is redundant.
Expecting respect while disregarding the opinion of others is not justifiable. This is much seen in the context of parenting. Nowadays, parents tend to fulfill their dreams and wishes through their children without considering the stance of their children. This can cultivate a rebellious nature in the children and reduce the esteem of the parents in the eyes of children. A stronger example can be taken from history. The dictatorship rule of Hitler is widely disrespected even today.
However, respect is not a given even after considering all perspectives. This can be explained by the fact that the decisions reached after considering viewpoints might be more favourable to some than others. This causes displeasure and unrest among the disregarded people and may lead to loss of respect for the decision maker. It is also possible that disregarding opinions can earn respect at a later stage. One eminent personality who disregarded the common opinion of others would be Mahatma Gandhi. His view of non-violence disregarded the mechanisms extant in the society then. Though disregarded initially, it was held in esteem later on globally.
In conclusion, considering all perspectives is not necessary in all situations. Also, respect is not a guarantee even after looking into all possibilities. However, in some unique cases, a disregard of common opinions might cultivate respect.
- The following appeared in an email written by the head of market research division to the president of a major candy company:“In the last four years the gross sales in the candy market have remained static, but ice cream, another confectionaryproduct, h 70
- Some people believe that competition drives young athletes to perform at their best while others believe that competition discourages those who are not athletically talented from participating in organized sports 23
- The following appeared in an internal memo circulated amongst the partners of a small design firm:“We, the four partners of Max Design, have made the company what it is. When we are hired by a client, it is our taste andstyle that the client is paying f 70
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the regional manager of the Taste of Italy restaurant chain:“After the first month of service, the new restaurant in the Flatplains Mall, which uses the Chipless brand of wine glasses,has reported a far lower 70
- “An increased number of laws or rules, ironically leads to a diminished sense of morality and impoverished relationsamong people.” 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...ed before taking necessary action. Hence,it is natural to assume that the leader of...
^^^
Line 4, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wpoints might be more favourable to some than others. This causes displeasure and...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.244943820225 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.175280898876 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0674157303371 0.0880659088768 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0629213483146 0.0497285424764 127% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0179775280899 0.0444667217837 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130337078652 0.12292977631 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0651685393258 0.0406280797675 160% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85767835932 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0269662921348 0.030933414821 87% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.12808988764 0.0997080785238 128% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0224719101124 0.0249443105267 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00674157303371 0.0148568991511 45% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2458.0 2732.02544248 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 452.878318584 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08415841584 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.405940594059 0.366273622748 111% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30198019802 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200495049505 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.141089108911 0.132149295362 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85767835932 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 219.290929204 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 58.8047983477 55.4138127331 106% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.16 23.380412469 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3205787736 59.4972553346 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.32 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.16 23.380412469 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.358019802 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.71929824561 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412319058493 0.391690518653 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0968271559349 0.123202303941 79% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0705215409888 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.480995275088 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.150302074052 0.149214159877 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14571074875 0.161403998019 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767068965801 0.0892212321368 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391099626721 0.385218514788 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0903020521313 0.0692045440612 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272074872073 0.275328986314 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05412567306 0.0653680567796 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.