The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980nwith projections until 2030.
The provided flow chart illustrates the amount of various types of fuel used annulay in the USA from 1980 to 2008, it also gives predictions about the trends throughout the following three decades. In general, fossil fuel is used heavily compared to renewable energy sources with the use of petrol and oil exceeding the rest of the categories.
Petrol and oil consumption fluctuated between 35 anf 30 quadriollion units between 1980 and 1997 then it adopted an upward direction up until the date this chart was created. It is expected to continue rising but less sharply. Oscillations were also the case with natural gas commencing at 20 quadrillion units, however, there was a common upward trend. Natural gas is projected to level out by 2015 onwards. Coal consumption starts slightly below natural gas at 16 quadrillion units and takes a course that is not entirley different to natural gas, but it is expected to rise moderately to reach 30 quadrillion units by 2030 leaving natural gas behind at 25 quadrillion units. Nuclear, solar and wind and hydropower all show a similar data starting just below 5 quradrillion units in 1980 and continuing on a stable trend until 2030 when nuclear power is predicted to be the highest followed by solar and wind leaving hydropower slightly behind.
In conclusion, the use of all forms of energy is climbing although this rise is happening at different rates being the sharpest with petrol, oil and coal and the slowest with renewable resources and some inconsistency with natural gas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-09-09 | icecat2005 | 67 | view |
- Countires are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or a negative development. 67
- In many countries there is a shortage of suitable people for essential jobs.What do you think are the causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it? 84
- What opposing theories a catastrophist and a gradualist might have. 10
- The charts show what the history and engineering graduates were doing six months after graduating 84
- Uk graduates and postgraduates students who did not go to full-time work after leaving college in 2008. 78
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'in conclusion', 'in general']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257352941176 0.268076937826 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.158088235294 0.116061578633 136% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0992647058824 0.0759168565197 131% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0441176470588 0.0366838410393 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0147058823529 0.0131127313244 112% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.155750635184 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0661764705882 0.0379272487307 174% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74752273868 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.0210936926555 139% => OK
Particles: 0.00367647058824 0.00175180941692 210% => OK
Determiners: 0.0882352941176 0.0948980150116 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00735294117647 0.00967000014798 76% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1532.0 1161.00487805 132% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.9 130% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00784313725 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73763899035 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356862745098 0.337110787985 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.286274509804 0.247514529752 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203921568627 0.171178102325 119% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125490196078 0.112407865282 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74752273868 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.546246751206 107% => OK
Word variations: 59.8740331062 49.3433353143 121% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.3333333333 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.7031387897 42.9750493124 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.222222222 135.714022679 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 23.0094962315 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.888888888889 0.689975730869 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 56.9607843137 47.7609492067 119% => OK
Elegance: 2.06779661017 2.94281807926 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254028977191 0.418131533498 61% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147521254949 0.181151798455 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106063701687 0.0850326197045 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591260103016 0.706616315825 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.240329565232 0.157042692854 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113747390009 0.228904883108 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113463015223 0.108899403657 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.231422970112 0.367819155151 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0565289505084 0.0812612215331 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20920217941 0.316326947829 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119419768132 0.0921553760075 130% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.