Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Research is crucial to better our understanding and knowledge about anything and everything. However due to the endless amount of studies conducted each day, this raises a questions of whether it is necessary to have many areas of research. If research is reduced to areas that benefit most people, there will be tremendous limitations on overall research and also, for the other people.
One hat size does not fit all and that’s essential to understand. If research is conducted to benefit most people, what happens to the rest that falls outside of that spectrum? These outliers need research conducted to help them as well. Scientists and researchers need to focus research on helping everyone; it could be broken into specific groups with similar characteristics or looked at holistically. Research should never be reduced to only potentially a maximum of people.
It’s necessary to have studies develop in all areas that can help everyone. Research is never wasted; it may be used to support another study or set them in the right direction. As time progresses, knowledge will increase and things will change. In order to adapt to these changes, researchers must explore numerous areas that may seem relevant at anytime. Newfound knowledge may open up solutions that would be much more beneficial that the current one.
Although research is best when it focuses all areas that is able to help everyone, limiting research to areas where most people benefits is not the worse idea. This could potentially save money and time since researchers have a clear understanding of what their focus should be one. The more data collected and experiment is duplicated, the results will be much better and more accurate. Researchers don’t have to worry about straying away from their main concerns
Research is crucial in our world; it provides information and guides our understanding. However, limiting research to areas where most people benefit would not be the best decision. It’s necessary to include every person and study all areas to achieve what is best for everyone.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Mukul | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-22 | Nikita Goel | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-15 | SOUMEDHIK | 83 | view |
| 2019-06-02 | dsbp15 | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-26 | fa1salahm3d | 58 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 83
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 66
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Claim: When planning courses, educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students.Reason: Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying.Write a response in which you discuss the exte 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a question' or simply 'questions'?
Suggestion: a question; questions
...studies conducted each day, this raises a questions of whether it is necessary to have many...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'well', 'as to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.215584415584 0.240241500013 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.192207792208 0.157235817809 122% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0857142857143 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0545454545455 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0363636363636 0.0444667217837 82% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0805194805195 0.12292977631 66% => OK
Participles: 0.038961038961 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78311016334 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0519480519481 0.030933414821 168% => OK
Particles: 0.0025974025974 0.0016655270985 156% => OK
Determiners: 0.0623376623377 0.0997080785238 63% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.038961038961 0.0249443105267 156% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0337662337662 0.0148568991511 227% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2107.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 338.0 452.878318584 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23372781065 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.366863905325 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.322485207101 0.280924506359 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224852071006 0.200843997647 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139053254438 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78311016334 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 219.290929204 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514792899408 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 53.9259170014 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7894736842 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3848539978 59.4972553346 56% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.894736842 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.421052631579 0.674092028746 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 50.0379943943 51.4728631049 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.18348623853 1.64882698954 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36974824574 0.391690518653 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0634053758241 0.123202303941 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0408407367198 0.077325440228 53% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.489385645957 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0966496873199 0.149214159877 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144451068972 0.161403998019 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543039367121 0.0892212321368 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380078236037 0.385218514788 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0548436579833 0.0692045440612 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261594389445 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430350561605 0.0653680567796 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.