The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar chart gives information about how many people visited New York City through three major airports, over a six-year period between 1995 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that over the period, there was a fluctuant trend in the number of passengers who travelled via John F. Kennedy airport, while the other two airports saw an upward trend. Another interesting point is that LaGuardia airport was the most popular at the end.
Looking at the detail, the number of travellers at John F. Kennedy airport started at 26m in 1995, and then increased remarkably to reach the highest point of 47m in 1997. In 1999, the figure dipped to 32m. At the last year, there was a slight growth to 44m. On the other hand, LaGuardia began at 35m in 1995, after that it rose remarkably for the next three years, at 46m. In 2000, LaGuardia hit the peak point at 68m travellers.
However, if we look at Newark airport, it started at the lowest point of 16m passengers in the first year. After this point, the trend increased significantly to 42m in 1998. In the last two years it remained stable at 42m travellers.
- Some people claim that living in big cities is creating difficulties whereas others think it makes easier. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The following diagram shows how greenhouse gases trap energy from the Sun. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown in the diagram. 61
- There are plenty of options available for spreading news such as newspapers radio TV Internet and so on According to your opinion what is the best media to use Why 80
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007. 67
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 41
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'then', 'while', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.219730941704 0.268076937826 82% => OK
Verbs: 0.0986547085202 0.116061578633 85% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0807174887892 0.0759168565197 106% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0269058295964 0.0366838410393 73% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0224215246637 0.0131127313244 171% => OK
Prepositions: 0.174887892377 0.155750635184 112% => OK
Participles: 0.00896860986547 0.0379272487307 24% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.42677821256 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0179372197309 0.0210936926555 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.107623318386 0.0948980150116 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00448430493274 0.00437022459523 103% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00896860986547 0.00967000014798 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1106.0 1161.00487805 95% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.9 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61421319797 5.90752243213 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.279187817259 0.337110787985 83% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.203045685279 0.247514529752 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.126903553299 0.171178102325 74% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0913705583756 0.112407865282 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42677821256 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609137055838 0.546246751206 112% => OK
Word variations: 58.9094994452 49.3433353143 119% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9090909091 23.0094962315 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8237921769 42.9750493124 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.545454545 135.714022679 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 23.0094962315 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.689975730869 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 38.213659437 47.7609492067 80% => OK
Elegance: 2.72727272727 2.94281807926 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412599843856 0.418131533498 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128267466969 0.181151798455 71% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0313803679228 0.0850326197045 37% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.660564525251 0.706616315825 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166266387076 0.157042692854 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182773625318 0.228904883108 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863315790307 0.108899403657 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.366646453355 0.367819155151 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.192297774043 0.0812612215331 237% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278642016503 0.316326947829 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784248068545 0.0921553760075 85% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.