Most artists earn low salaries and should therefore receive funding from the government in order for them to continue with their work. To what extent do you agree?
Despite the fact that artists have played a significant role in the human civilization throughout the history, they are being neglected from ancient past. Funding artists to complete their masterpiece has always been a debatable topic. Some argue that there are more areas where the fund can be spent than the art, but I assume that it is quite necessary for a life of the art.
There are many arguments on opposing of the peculiar help to the artists. Firstly, due to a prevalent belief in our society that art is a trivial skill which can be owned by anyone, they don’t find justifiability on f...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-03-08 | Jason Khau | 67 | view |
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behaviour. If sporting events cause 55
- Politicians are more responsible for protection of the environment than individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 39
- Some people think that the best way to run a business is within the family What are the advantages and disadvantages of a family run business 87
- Small businesses should avoid recruiting young women who do not have their own family in order to avoid paying maternity leave later on To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...ery less compare to other white-collars because of the fact that they can be replaced easily. Because of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in fact', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224586288416 0.247107183377 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.16548463357 0.155533422707 106% => OK
Adjectives: 0.080378250591 0.0946595960268 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0260047281324 0.0501214627716 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0496453900709 0.0437548338989 113% => OK
Prepositions: 0.130023640662 0.122226691241 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0378250591017 0.0403226058552 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.65313047949 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0330969267139 0.0326793684256 101% => OK
Particles: 0.00472813238771 0.00163938923432 288% => OK
Determiners: 0.106382978723 0.0861772015684 123% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0236406619385 0.021408717616 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0212765957447 0.011925033212 178% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2197.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 372.0 316.048096192 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90591397849 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317204301075 0.374742101984 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266129032258 0.28420135186 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174731182796 0.203846283523 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10752688172 0.137316102897 78% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65313047949 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.037074148 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545698924731 0.56093040696 97% => OK
Word variations: 60.7519240087 60.7387585426 100% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0891783567 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6666666667 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8233177356 49.517814964 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.055555556 127.492653851 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7743622355 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.814263465372 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 47.2795698925 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.62745098039 1.69124875643 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293318553944 0.332605444948 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0929733441963 0.102741220458 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0543806297122 0.0668466124924 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.499141826204 0.534860350844 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.182614870483 0.148594505496 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121817374323 0.134430193775 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432734985628 0.0742795772207 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.436429093632 0.324371583561 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0462153268856 0.0638462369009 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20631158057 0.228012699653 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470356049377 0.058150111329 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.