integareted 47
Both the reading and the lecture discuss the capability of powered flight in pterosaurs. In the reading section, the writer contends that ptersaurs were not capable of powered flight and provides three reasons for support; however, the professor casts doubts on reading points by indicating that they were capable of powered flight.
First of all, the writer claims that since modern reptiles are cold-blooded, pterosaurs were cold-blooded too, so they had not enough energy to fly; in contrast, the professor rejects this notion by stating that as evidenced by fossil records, there is fur covering on the body of Pterosaurs which elucidates they were warm-blooded and they use this mechanism in order to protect themselves on different weather circumstances.
Moreover, the reading sections holds the view that ptersaurs were too heavy to be able to flag their wings fast; as a result, they could not stay for a long time; on the contrary, ptersaurs had low weight despite their large body.
In addition, the writer mentions that fossilized bones shows that ptersaurs's back leg muscles were not enough strong to be able to take off from the ground; conversely, the professor indicates that ptersaurs used their four legs to push themselves and they did not just use their back legs but birds just use their back legs to walk on the ground.
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes. 70
- Some believe that one should spend more time being far away from the people we care about because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about while others think being away from people we care about can d 87
- integrated 48 60
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
- integrated 46 73
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233606557377 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.16393442623 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0819672131148 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0737704918033 0.0435111971325 170% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0532786885246 0.0277247811725 192% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135245901639 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0204918032787 0.0370669169778 55% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60005135022 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0327868852459 0.0208969081088 157% => OK
Particles: 0.00409836065574 0.00154638098197 265% => OK
Determiners: 0.0860655737705 0.128158765124 67% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00409836065574 0.0158828679856 26% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00819672131148 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1345.0 1645.83664459 82% => OK
No of words: 222.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05855855856 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.351351351351 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279279279279 0.287516216867 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18018018018 0.187439937562 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135135135135 0.113142543107 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60005135022 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572072072072 0.539623497131 106% => OK
Word variations: 54.9210317009 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 5.0 13.0529801325 38% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 44.4 21.7502111507 204% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 114.26040434 49.3711431718 231% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 269.0 132.220823453 203% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 44.4 21.7502111507 204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.4 0.878197800319 273% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 72.3279279279 50.5018328374 143% => OK
Elegance: 1.33802816901 1.90840788429 70% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.283774756682 0.142949733639 199% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0770063607791 0.0787303798458 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.928152070061 0.631733273073 147% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108083838175 0.139662658121 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.288256193675 0.414875509568 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0452916711081 0.0530846634433 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 5.0 10.2958057395 49% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.