In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Eating fast food becomes the biggest concern especially in developed countries because this malnutrition food can cause several health issues. Some people claim that the government should impose a higher tax rate on fast food in order to restrict this issue. Even though the higher tax rate on fast food can reduce the consumption rate in some extent, but this will be the short run goal. Since people have addicted to stimulus tastes with the convenient reason, the taxation would not restrict people’s consumption. Therefore, I completely disagree with this solution and I believe that the government should find an alternative solution to tackle this solution.
There is a growing rate of people who consume junk foods in developed countries especially in Australia and this causes massive health issues including heart failure and various cancers. In Australia, the survey had announced that 99% of people have had consumed junk foods in 2014 and among those, about 60% have answered as they relied their daily meals on fast foods. This proportion is increasing every year and predicted to be reaching at 95% by 2020. If this is the case, the government would be suffered from sick people and diseases, and it is necessary to find the desperate measure to put a halt to junk food consumption.
Imposing taxation can be seen as one of measure to be used to restrict people’s unhealthy diet. If the government imposes a higher tax on fast foods, people will stop eating fast foods, because the price will be higher. If the price for fast foods is similar to those of other restaurant foods’ price, then people would no longer choose the fast foods. Also, if this repetitive choice will become a habit of people and they can consume healthier foods. Therefore, people can maintain their health diets by eating non-junk foods.
Even though the higher tax rate can stop the unhealthy diets and make people to maintain healthy diets, this is only for a short term. People consume fast foods for convenient, stimulus tastes and easy access reasons and the price is just one of those lists. If people are already addicted to stimulus tastes then the price would not be the matter. In the UK, for instance, had introduced the higher tax on fast foods in 2013 and within a month, this had been vailed out since the consumption rate did not change. As a result, imposing a tax on fast food would not be the ultimate solution to restrict people’s consumptions on fast foods. Therefore, the government should find the alternative methods to solve this issue rather than taxation.
In conclusion, eating junk food is problem and common phenomenon in developed countries. As this issue is increasing, the health issue related to such consumption also rises. The government and some people have suggested imposing higher taxes on fast foods to decrease the consumption rates but I believe that this is not practical, because people cannot stop with stimulus craving desires. Therefore, the government should look for the other measures to control people’s eating habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most experiences in our lives that seem difficult at the time become valuable lessons for the future. 67
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others contest those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit What is your position Discuss bot 94
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 56
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in two European countries since 2000 and predicted unemployment rates until 2020 79
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d the price is just one of those lists. If people are already addicted to stimulus...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271944922547 0.247107183377 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.161790017212 0.155533422707 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0826161790017 0.0946595960268 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0464716006885 0.0501214627716 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.013769363167 0.0437548338989 31% => OK
Prepositions: 0.103270223752 0.122226691241 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0481927710843 0.0403226058552 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.62071248523 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0292598967298 0.0326793684256 90% => OK
Particles: 0.00172117039587 0.00163938923432 105% => OK
Determiners: 0.10843373494 0.0861772015684 126% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0344234079174 0.021408717616 161% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00172117039587 0.011925033212 14% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3088.0 1933.35771543 160% => OK
No of words: 511.0 316.048096192 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04305283757 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.20517956788 113% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385518590998 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250489236791 0.28420135186 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180039138943 0.203846283523 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.119373776908 0.137316102897 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62071248523 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.037074148 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422700587084 0.56093040696 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.2172899183 60.7387585426 79% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0891783567 149% => OK
Sentence length: 21.2916666667 20.7743622355 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7887076775 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 127.492653851 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2916666667 20.7743622355 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.416666666667 0.814263465372 51% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 46.3405903457 49.1944974215 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.90697674419 1.69124875643 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306588467629 0.332605444948 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135291607977 0.102741220458 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0942255099764 0.0668466124924 141% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520596099129 0.534860350844 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0994529249735 0.148594505496 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127271992354 0.134430193775 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439658702947 0.0742795772207 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.44586373236 0.324371583561 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0777733566272 0.0638462369009 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223310375639 0.228012699653 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160058518128 0.058150111329 28% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.41683366733 205% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 11.0 2.5751503006 427% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 1.9629258517 357% => OK
Total topic words: 24.0 10.4468937876 230% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.