Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos.
The curiosity of animal has never faded among the children, especially for those who are living in metropolises. The zoo seems to be a best way for them to learn about wild animals, therefore some peoples embrace the idea of keeping animals inside zoos. However, not everyone justifies the value of zoo. In this essay, we will discuss both side of compelling arguments.
To begin with the opponents, they believe that zoos are no longer necessary in this technological era, basing on the reason that there are wide range of animals information available on internet. The Internet not only provide image but also video along with full description related to animals habitat and behavior. In addition, the images or videos video are in fact more realistic to reflect the natural environment as the animals are taken under micro camera and they do not aware that they were being watched, which is different from zoos where the animals are seemingly a display for the visitors.
The people, on the other hand, believe that the functions of zoos are far beyond the educational purpose to our offspring, but to provide a shelter to many kinds of animals which are beyond extinction. Taking an example in China, the pandas which are one of the highly extinct animals among all the others have extremely slow surivial rate during earily age as most of the pandas are lack of ability to take care their offspring. Zoos in China not only provide a shelter and food to them, but also take care of their offspring with professional baby sister. Thanks to their tremendous effort on pandas, the number of pandas is increasing in recent years. From this prospective, zoos actually play an important role on saving animals.
Even though zoos are no longer playing an crucial role on acquisition of animal knowledge, they have been transformed into other areas like animal protection. It is believable that the zoos will continue to stride on saving animals from extinction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-26 | gillmandeep0260 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games.What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects? 91
- The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be mad 73
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from you 77
- The idea of going overseas for university study is an exciting prospect for many people. But while it may offer some advantages, it is probably better to stay home because of the difficulties a student inevitably encounters living and studying in a differ 31
- Zoos are sometimes seen as necessary but not poor alternatives to a natural environment. Discuss some of the arguments for and/or against keeping animals in zoos. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ng in metropolises. The zoo seems to be a best way for them to learn about wild a...
^
Line 8, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Even though zoos are no longer playing an crucial role on acquisition of animal k...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'to begin with', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.254847645429 0.247107183377 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.152354570637 0.155533422707 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0720221606648 0.0946595960268 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0664819944598 0.0501214627716 133% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0332409972299 0.0437548338989 76% => OK
Prepositions: 0.15512465374 0.122226691241 127% => OK
Participles: 0.0443213296399 0.0403226058552 110% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.55648040177 2.80594681477 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0332409972299 0.0326793684256 102% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0997229916898 0.0861772015684 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00554016620499 0.021408717616 26% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0138504155125 0.011925033212 116% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1966.0 1933.35771543 102% => OK
No of words: 331.0 316.048096192 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93957703927 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20517956788 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.347432024169 0.374742101984 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.247734138973 0.28420135186 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.148036253776 0.203846283523 73% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12084592145 0.137316102897 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55648040177 2.80594681477 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.037074148 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583081570997 0.56093040696 104% => OK
Word variations: 65.2659760587 60.7387585426 107% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6428571429 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1973456327 49.517814964 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 127.492653851 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.814263465372 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 48.4162710401 49.1944974215 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.8021978022 1.69124875643 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446829074755 0.332605444948 134% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124648492695 0.102741220458 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0721780450071 0.0668466124924 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.558962369993 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164394011468 0.148594505496 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171818527053 0.134430193775 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708130408334 0.0742795772207 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.371496135694 0.324371583561 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0808132595144 0.0638462369009 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287555177405 0.228012699653 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847819115725 0.058150111329 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.