Do you agree or disagree with the following statements: students learn better when they are not threatened with possible failure. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion.
Student learning is one of important process that would favor student to achieve better education. There are several conditions and characteristics that support the effectiveness of learning’s outcome. Sometimes teachers or parents threaten student with the possibility of negative outcome in order to push them achieve higher result. Some people, however, argue that students should not receive this treatment. I personally believe that threatening strategy is not wisely appropriate for motivating students for some reasons.
People have different intellectual and emotional abilities. Such abilities would determine students’ reaction when they face challenges and pressures. Those who posses high abilities on these particular skills would react more calmly and thus able to complete the tasks better than who doesn’t. Students with high intellectual and emotional skills are also better in articulating motivation. They will be able to utilize the pressure as their power to do greater.
Naturally, the way people behave and act are controlled by mind. So when students’ mind is threatened with negative thoughts, the result of their works will probably worsen. People’s mind is also able to either enlarge or limit their true capabilities. So when they think negatively, their true personal capabilities will be limited with its negative thoughts and thus will result poor result.
On the other hand, there are other factors that could favor students to learn better. Open communication is important to help students learn better. Interactive learning will make students become less stressful and thus help them absorb learning materials better. Progress monitoring is also another factor that would help students in better learning process. For example, each student might have one direct mentor/teacher that would monitor his/her performance in class and give personal feedback.
In conclusion, threatening students with negative result would not help students study better because otherwise it may harm their motivation and capabilities. I think communication and mentoring session are the key factors that indeed would favor students in better learning process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | alienmonster | 70 | view |
- Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language. 70
- Compare and contrast the advantages of city living and country living. Defend your preference. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements: students learn better when they are not threatened with possible failure. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion. 10
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The private car has brought more harm than benefits to the planet Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion 83
- Technology is available to exploit the potential energy formed by tides for the generation of electrical energy. The basic structure is a barrage or dam built across a river estuary or at the mouth of a bay. This dam is similar to that used in hydroelectr 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...tors that could favor students to learn better. Open communication is important to hel...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...ion is important to help students learn better. Interactive learning will make student...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... would help students in better learning process. For example, each student might have o...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...would favor students in better learning process.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'i think', 'in conclusion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243169398907 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.180327868852 0.158761421928 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117486338798 0.0866891130778 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0628415300546 0.046263068375 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0437158469945 0.0685040099705 64% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0737704918033 0.118717715034 62% => OK
Participles: 0.0245901639344 0.0351676179071 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.74552980029 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0218579234973 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0437158469945 0.0887237588012 49% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0437158469945 0.0209618222197 209% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0300546448087 0.0139019557991 216% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2211.0 2387.08602151 93% => OK
No of words: 330.0 408.028673835 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.7 5.86048508987 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48200974243 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.448484848485 0.338922669872 132% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.360606060606 0.251872472559 143% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.266666666667 0.174417080927 153% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.145454545455 0.112833075102 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74552980029 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 58.3332628898 59.2087087015 99% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.5 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6252327321 48.84282405 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.55 120.699889404 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.5533526081 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.644075263715 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 52.5606060606 45.7405998639 115% => OK
Elegance: 1.19047619048 1.45489161554 82% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27967033772 0.300154397459 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109743622534 0.103427244359 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650601337042 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49939884592 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126370692155 0.151897553556 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096432424859 0.114077575197 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424204203017 0.0781384742642 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.219561370009 0.336927656856 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.114389746003 0.067059652881 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171005610374 0.210909579961 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020596304441 0.0618886996521 33% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.