Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With the development of technology, information became essential part of societies. It has been suggested that by getting facts from different sources, people can get a better understanding of news. As far as I'm concerned, I got convinced by this idea. However, some people believe that getting information from different sources is a time-consuming action. From my vantage point, being familiar with different viewpoints and discovering the accurate information about news, are two advantages of this strategy.
To begin with, getting data from different resources gives a person the opportunity to get information from different perspectives. For example, in my home country, government controls multimedia specially television channels. To get accurate information people need to complement their information which came from TV news, with Internet and on-line Social Networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and so on. Critics who can freely express their opinion in the online systems, always provides interesting data and compare the different information. Therefore, seeing events and news from different angle is a beneficial activity which facilitates through getting information from different sources.
Along with different perspectives, getting multi-dimensional news would provide the chance to know what the basic news is. In other words, by putting different information about specific news, like parts of puzzle, a person can perceive news and be aware of the stem of it. For example, reading about an event in newspapers and magazines cannot cover all aspects of the event. Because newspapers and magazines just record the reading about the event and provide its pictures. However, Multimedia like TV show the videos of the event and conducts speaking about it. Therefore, without watching the videos of the event people can’t completely know what just happened.
To conclude, having different sources of news not only provides good understanding of different views of news, but also deep conclusive understanding of what just happened accurately. Therefore, it challenges person’s mind to find important aspects of news. There is no doubt that keeping mind active is a good practice of healthy living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | shrijan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mobinzaarreh | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | bbbbaaakkk | 60 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific theories presented in the reading passage. 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...better understanding of news. As far as Im concerned, I got convinced by this idea...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'therefore', 'for example', 'no doubt', 'speaking about', 'such as', 'in other words', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262886597938 0.229887763892 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.154639175258 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.090206185567 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0489690721649 0.046263068375 106% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0257731958763 0.0685040099705 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14175257732 0.118717715034 119% => OK
Participles: 0.0438144329897 0.0351676179071 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04330138487 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0180412371134 0.0309702414327 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.069587628866 0.0887237588012 78% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0154639175258 0.0209618222197 74% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0154639175258 0.0139019557991 111% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2232.0 2387.08602151 94% => OK
No of words: 336.0 408.028673835 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.64285714286 5.86048508987 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48200974243 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4375 0.338922669872 129% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.366071428571 0.251872472559 145% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.279761904762 0.174417080927 160% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.205357142857 0.112833075102 182% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.04330138487 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556547619048 0.524397521467 106% => OK
Word variations: 60.6071468265 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6842105263 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1883328822 48.84282405 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.473684211 120.699889404 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 54.2913533835 45.7405998639 119% => OK
Elegance: 1.95505617978 1.45489161554 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282670185553 0.300154397459 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127029277069 0.103427244359 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10098273843 0.0752933317313 134% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.509458992899 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.12348571071 0.151897553556 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106991315893 0.114077575197 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780347804252 0.0781384742642 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.281414016799 0.336927656856 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0423979671362 0.067059652881 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188805479248 0.210909579961 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855564039514 0.0618886996521 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.