The graph below gives information about international tourist arrivals in five countries.
The graph represents the overall number of tourist’s arrivals from five different countries, namely; Brazil, Egypt, Malaysia, France and the US from 1995 to 2010. Units are measured in millions.
Overall, majority of tourists were from the USA and which dominant number of arrivals remained unchanged for the projected periods, but by 2010, there was a drastic increase with the number of tourists arrived from France had the same arrival number as the USA’s. Meanwhile, the arrivals from the rest of countries had grown in its number but which were minimal.
Over 70 million of arrivals were from USA in 1985 and this number grew steadily to 90 million people from 1995 to 2005. By 2010, the number of USA tourists decreased by 5 million. Concurrently, the number of French tourists had the drastic increase in visiting a country from around 30 million tourists to close to 85 million tourists in the same years.
In contrast, there was a steady growth in the number of tourists for Malaysia, Egypt and Brazil. Among those, Malaysia had the higher arrival numbers than that of Brazil and Egypt. By 2010, Malaysia recorded of about 40 million tourists whereas Brazil and Egypt had 20 million tourists.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | jayppatel | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | happyhappy | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | yeu192 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-06 | bibikulsum | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Janu1998 | 56 | view |
- In many countries people are concerned about the number of children who are overweight. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The line graph shows total bonus payments from April to March by a private sector, financial year ending 2001 to financial year ending 2016 in the UK. 73
- A society develops the technology in communicating devices rapidly such as smart phones, tablets and other communicating devices. Some people claims that the disadvantages of such device outweigh the advantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 56
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264957264957 0.268076937826 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.0940170940171 0.116061578633 81% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0683760683761 0.0759168565197 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0128205128205 0.0366838410393 35% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0042735042735 0.0131127313244 33% => OK
Prepositions: 0.166666666667 0.155750635184 107% => OK
Participles: 0.025641025641 0.0379272487307 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.54557998366 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0213675213675 0.0210936926555 101% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0940170940171 0.0948980150116 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00854700854701 0.00967000014798 88% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1217.0 1161.00487805 105% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.9 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02475247525 5.90752243213 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.415841584158 0.337110787985 123% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30198019802 0.247514529752 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.212871287129 0.171178102325 124% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0792079207921 0.112407865282 70% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54557998366 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.546246751206 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 43.8385711343 49.3433353143 89% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4444444444 23.0094962315 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.1414694609 42.9750493124 217% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.222222222 135.714022679 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 23.0094962315 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.555555555556 0.689975730869 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 52.6424642464 47.7609492067 110% => OK
Elegance: 4.11538461538 2.94281807926 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200835514961 0.418131533498 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.175214063592 0.181151798455 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0989862636321 0.0850326197045 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.682885004678 0.706616315825 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.19787715774 0.157042692854 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100265236003 0.228904883108 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694872125428 0.108899403657 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.413867335392 0.367819155151 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0526026626764 0.0812612215331 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157621561288 0.316326947829 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744552534641 0.0921553760075 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70731707317 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.16585365854 190% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.