Compare and contrast the advantages of choosing a stable career over an adventurous lifestyle. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion.
So many choices in life that people must decide including job preferences. Some people may demand stable career job but others may prefer outdoor job that would support their adventurous lifestyle. While living in non-constant lifestyle is less boring, some people argue that stable career would guarantee a better life. However, it is important for people to review both the benefits of working in a stable career and non-stable one.
Outdoor profession requires high travel time that may lead to less leisure time. A news reporter, for example, would have travel a lot domestically or internationally to find great stories. They would be apart from their home and families. A cabin crew, although she can visit many countries, probably will be difficult to visit their parents after work like many office workers do. While it is true that outdoor jobs will give the opportunity to find new friends and places each day, time an invaluable benefit that could be neglected.
On the other hand, stable career would have a better chance of work-life balance. Working 8-hours a day, office workers still have plenty of time for other things. They still can take their kids to school every morning or catch up with some friends in the evening. Although travel cannot be avoided, career jobs would typically demand lesser travel time. An accountant, for example, would only spend two to three days a month to present at regional meeting outside office. Because of more predictable schedule, most of office workers can budget future time more wisely. When they know the upcoming months would be hectic, they would take some day-offs for some family trip in advance.
While income opportunities might be equal, living cost could be higher for outdoor professionals. A pilot would have to allocate money for himself when he is on duty and for his family at home. He must buy his own meals when he actually could have meal together with his family at home. Outdoor professions requires more expensive supporting equipment. Professional fishers, for example, would have to allocate monthly expenses for boat maintenance and sailing accommodation.
In conclusion, choosing a lifestyle should be the decision of the person itself but or she must be able to identify which lifestyle fit the best with his or her personality and life’s expectation. Some people might want to spend more time with their family so they choose to be an office worker, but some others might want to travel a lot. I personally prefer a stable career job because it allows me to manage my time more proportionally between work and personal time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-12-25 | michael2018abc | 3 | view |
2016-10-07 | kantanandana | 71 | view |
- Think critically about the following statement. A universal language should replace all languages. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a universal language. 70
- Compare and contrast the advantages of choosing a stable career over an adventurous lifestyle. Use reasons and specific examples to support your opinion. 71
- Many people believe that parents are too permissive with their children nowadays Do you agree that this is a problem Defend your answer 81
- Compare and contrast the advantages of city living and country living. Defend your preference. 73
- The best teacher is one who is very knowledgeable about the subject matter Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... maintenance and sailing accommodation. In conclusion, choosing a lifestyle shou...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ionally between work and personal time.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'while', 'apart from', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259336099585 0.229887763892 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.136929460581 0.158761421928 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101659751037 0.0866891130778 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0435684647303 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0580912863071 0.0685040099705 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0954356846473 0.118717715034 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0207468879668 0.0351676179071 59% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60137432497 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0311203319502 0.0309702414327 100% => OK
Particles: 0.00207468879668 0.00188951952338 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.0684647302905 0.0887237588012 77% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0622406639004 0.0209618222197 297% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0145228215768 0.0139019557991 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2629.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 434.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05760368664 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373271889401 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23732718894 0.251872472559 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.158986175115 0.174417080927 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0944700460829 0.112833075102 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60137432497 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511520737327 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 58.0009597591 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0833333333 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7769734504 48.84282405 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.541666667 120.699889404 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0833333333 20.5533526081 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.541666666667 0.644075263715 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 41.8160522273 45.7405998639 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.57391304348 1.45489161554 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206923632025 0.300154397459 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0905140247385 0.103427244359 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100057103274 0.0752933317313 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.449124677537 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117909602059 0.151897553556 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659911257635 0.114077575197 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569312711144 0.0781384742642 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.19025244297 0.336927656856 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.053025839832 0.067059652881 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131811887962 0.210909579961 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557038837088 0.0618886996521 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.91756272401 203% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.75985663082 362% => OK
Total topic words: 23.0 13.6433691756 169% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.