An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat the medical condition
I'd like to take the side of the patient, that he should have easy access to his or her doctor's record of treating patients who had similar ailments. This will indeed help the patient get a better idea regarding whether the particular doctor is suitable to treat that medical condition.
Getting hands on the records will allow the patient to do a thorough assessment of the way that doctor works. Which will in turn enlighten the future path that the patient will go through if he or she decides to choose that doctor. First of all this clears up many questions from the patients mind. Let's say a cancer patient will get a better idea of around how many chemotherapy session will take place and what will be timeline for the comming sessions.
Also by getting the records, the patients gets the chance to get in contact with the other patients who have already been in his or her shoes. They can get idea about the experience the other patient had with the doctor. Apart from this it will also help the patient get a betting understanding of the prognosis of the ailment . Patients can also share some home remedy information with each other. For example a patient suffering from malaria can aid the other patient by suggesting a home remedy that taking bath with water having neem leaves soaked in it helps in reducing the irritation.
The patient also gets the idea about the future costs that he might have to bare by seeing the medical records, so that he can be better prepared regarding the arrangement of the resources. If the doctor's methods are too costly he can start looking for other doctor so that he doesn't end up stuck in the middle of his treatment.
Having the patients record open to all other patient also creates a transparency between the doctor and the patient that is very much important fromt the patients perspective.
But as every coin has two sides, this has it flaws too. Giving the records implies that the privacy and confidentiality of the patient is gone. These records can also be misused which is very harmful to the doctor's reputation and of course the patient.
Having said that, I'd still be inclined on the records being available to the patient as its pros outweighs its cons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large 50
- Seniority (years of service) should not be the basis of employee compensation. Employees should be promoted and given raises solely on the basis of their work performance and merit. That is a better way to encourage high productivity 50
- In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town,we should encourage.Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area.The Hillview landfill which has been undevelopped for decades is a perfect site for this plant.the buil 50
- The following was used as part of an internet advertising company's appeal to businesses: Furniture Depot employed our internet advertising company to help. Since then its sales increased by 10% over last year's totals. Furniture Depot's success demonstra 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
Id like to take the side of the patient, t...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... many questions from the patients mind. Lets say a cancer patient will get a better ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chemotherapy seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much chemotherapy', 'a good deal of chemotherapy'.
Suggestion: much chemotherapy; a good deal of chemotherapy
...nt will get a better idea of around how many chemotherapy session will take place and what will b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e timeline for the comming sessions. Also by getting the records, the patients ge...
^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...standing of the prognosis of the ailment . Patients can also share some home remed...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...art looking for other doctor so that he doesnt end up stuck in the middle of his treat...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...t that is very much important fromt the patients perspective. But as every coin has t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 208, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...be misused which is very harmful to the doctors reputation and of course the patient. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 19, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...ourse the patient. Having said that, Id still be inclined on the records being ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'still', 'apart from', 'for example', 'of course', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248192771084 0.240241500013 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.168674698795 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0650602409639 0.0880659088768 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0385542168675 0.0497285424764 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0433734939759 0.0444667217837 98% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127710843373 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0530120481928 0.0406280797675 130% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.39619551396 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0240963855422 0.030933414821 78% => OK
Particles: 0.00481927710843 0.0016655270985 289% => OK
Determiners: 0.146987951807 0.0997080785238 147% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0385542168675 0.0249443105267 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0144578313253 0.0148568991511 97% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2230.0 2732.02544248 82% => OK
No of words: 393.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67430025445 6.0361032391 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.325699745547 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.23155216285 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.114503816794 0.200843997647 57% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0687022900763 0.132149295362 52% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39619551396 2.79330140395 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486005089059 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 52.3890733119 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8333333333 23.380412469 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2578494762 59.4972553346 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.380412469 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.21349557522 173% => OK
Readability: 44.9885496183 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.71153846154 1.64882698954 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459109408161 0.391690518653 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128090822346 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862770770339 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.664348847926 0.547984918172 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.185564354394 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208791076508 0.161403998019 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109937934407 0.0892212321368 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.402732564031 0.385218514788 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0736034411048 0.0692045440612 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303979174421 0.275328986314 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106461589064 0.0653680567796 163% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.