Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Critical Judgment of any work will be most significant part. An expert in any field is someone, who have mastered it all aspects. The statement said about the value of critical judgement comes from an expert would have been examined better than the normal person. It is true that to examine any situation or work, expertise advices are meaningful and valuable. The Verdict can be changed effectively, if the results come from the expert rather than non-expert group. The Situation can be seen in a more articulated way by an expert's results.
The work or the situation may belong from any field, from science to religion or from crime to marksheet of a student. The scientific work can be examined better by a scientist than any religious pundit. If we look at Net Neutrality case in India, Facebook launched their campaign to provide free Internet to people. Moreover, this was a strategy to monopolize the market with one of the telecom mammoth. People started to register in campaign without knowing its consequences until, the IT people came up against it. People understood the results afterwards and protested against the forgery that costed facebook to take back it. It was the expert of the field of Internet who understood the situation and provided the healthy debate to aware the people.
If we look at the defence ministry of any country, ministers or political leaders take decision of military forces. In India, President is the supremo of Indian Army who usually comes from Political background. They always take advice of Ex-militants, Generals or security advisers of the country before arbitrating any choice. A political leader can provide the little knowledge in that case but can get lucid understanding from the expert of that field.
The viewpoint of the statement is the corroboration that expert are always needed to evaluate any work or situation. This essay will be sent to an expert who has already achieved the mastery in the writing field. It can be evaluated by a school student or college graduate but the expert will always all the possible thoughts attached to the essay. The judgment should always been done by an expert for the veracity of the work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- "Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with 50
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 50
- The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large. 50
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ticulated way by an experts results. The work or the situation may belong from a...
^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r from crime to marksheet of a student. The scientific work can be examined better ...
^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...without knowing its consequences until, the IT people came up against it. People under...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peoples'?
Suggestion: peoples
... knowing its consequences until, the IT people came up against it. People understood t...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.270676691729 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.15037593985 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0526315789474 0.0880659088768 60% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0325814536341 0.0497285424764 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0275689223058 0.0444667217837 62% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127819548872 0.12292977631 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0401002506266 0.0406280797675 99% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.66381837661 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0300751879699 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00501253132832 0.0016655270985 301% => OK
Determiners: 0.15037593985 0.0997080785238 151% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0300751879699 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0125313283208 0.0148568991511 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2191.0 2732.02544248 80% => OK
No of words: 368.0 452.878318584 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95380434783 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.410326086957 0.366273622748 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301630434783 0.280924506359 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.209239130435 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.108695652174 0.132149295362 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66381837661 2.79330140395 95% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.8714316113 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5238095238 23.380412469 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.927257665 59.4972553346 35% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 141.124799967 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 23.380412469 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.333333333333 0.674092028746 49% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.6868530021 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 2.08333333333 1.64882698954 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289469610718 0.391690518653 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109055493101 0.123202303941 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0874294610913 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.531425810225 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.140170888933 0.149214159877 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128278587172 0.161403998019 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912540991367 0.0892212321368 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.40228598816 0.385218514788 104% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0437832665098 0.0692045440612 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232791931359 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768660297459 0.0653680567796 118% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.