The general welfare of a nation's people is a better indication of that nation's greatness than are the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A nation's primary duty is to look after the well being of its people. However, linking greatness of the country to the prosperity of the citizens, would be an exaggeration. Looking after the needs of people is the moral responsibility of a nation's government. It is not any kind of obligation, as people are entitled to receive all the basic facilities. As per my view, a country should be deemed as "Great", when it does something exceptional in any field, be it science or art or any other vocation that wins accolades from all across the globe.
Rulers in democratic as well as monarchic nations propose and frame the policies for the development of the country. These policies are directly related to the well being of people. For example, Abraham Lincoln drew policies to end civil war in America, whose end result was welfare of the people. He made a considerable contribution in making the USA, a great nation.
Likewise, Winston Churchill can be linked to the greatness of England. His extraordinary leadership skills during second world war are remembered till date.
Contribution of scientists or artists can hardly be sidelined while measuring the greatness of a country. Neil Armstrong, the first person to walk on moon made his country, the USA extremely proud of his achievement. Even other nations had to acknowledge this great achievement in the field of science. Coming to artists, let me quote Pablo Picasso, the world renowned painter from Spain. His work is appreciated even in the modern days.
To conclude, yes, welfare of people should be linked to the greatness of a country, but by no means it is a better measure than the contribution of artists, rulers or scientists in a country's progress. Unless and until, people of a nation do something out of the box, which not only benefits their own country, but also works wonders for the entire mankind, I will not attribute that nation as "Great".
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you 68
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 58
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: A nation; Nations
A nations primary duty is to look after the well ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...people is the moral responsibility of a nations government. It is not any kind of oblig...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'likewise', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'kind of', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.291005291005 0.240241500013 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.132275132275 0.157235817809 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0555555555556 0.0880659088768 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0343915343915 0.0497285424764 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.037037037037 0.0444667217837 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126984126984 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0396825396825 0.0406280797675 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.00900858021 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0291005291005 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116402116402 0.0997080785238 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015873015873 0.0249443105267 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00793650793651 0.0148568991511 53% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1944.0 2732.02544248 71% => OK
No of words: 326.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96319018405 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371165644172 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.279141104294 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.199386503067 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128834355828 0.132149295362 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00900858021 2.79330140395 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 61.3977025602 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1111111111 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3993084807 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 141.124799967 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.722222222222 0.674092028746 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 46.0252215406 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.24675324675 1.64882698954 136% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.545544394986 0.391690518653 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0916633258392 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0665612442485 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.557268994071 0.547984918172 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.093776105112 0.149214159877 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216224738063 0.161403998019 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869790493291 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.289576008177 0.385218514788 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104120885522 0.0692045440612 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34556929925 0.275328986314 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111754024505 0.0653680567796 171% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.