People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Humans often tend to be unpredictable decision makers. Their logic and emotion are equally tested when confronted with perplexing choices.
People who bias their choices with emotion rather logic and fundamentally susceptable to pitfalls. Their approach to a situation doesn't see the other possible sides. So it's likely to be failed. In an extension to the disastrous outcome of their result, they even try to defend their emotionally burdened and logically punctured decisions.
Going by the definition,a poor decision is the one in which all the inputs are not weighed adequately and the result is not considered an important factor of the decision. Those decisions often reflect the mislead conclusions and unreasonable biases of the decision maker. As these decision makers do not anticipate the outcome they feel obliged to defend their decision. Hence, when they feel that a decision taken with a logical approach would have been successful, they hurriedly justify their acts as rather logical pertaining to then situations.
Consider, for example, parents who wouldn't wish to leave their child at a school far away from their home but much better in educational standards than the one near to their home. They are very much evident of the fact that if they had at any time considered the chance of providing a better future for the kid by setting aside the emotional hazard of leaving their kid, the outcome would be glorious. Instead he fell prey for their poor decision and then try to defend their stand by stating that the child may feel depressed leaving home at a young age and thus their decision is a logically backed one.
So people who bias their choices with emotions and justify their actions later are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
- Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the numbe 41
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A nation should require all its students to follow the same national curriculum until they reach college. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 24, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...ed decisions. Going by the definition,a poor decision is the one in which all t...
^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...decision. Those decisions often reflect the mislead conclusions and unreasonable biases of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...easonable biases of the decision maker. As these decision makers do not anticipate...
^^
Line 7, column 409, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...eir kid, the outcome would be glorious. Instead he fell prey for their poor decision an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, then, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07534246575 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5880896273 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551369863014 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5593421432 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313875789421 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13472713744 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11007944144 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232432058203 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111235917575 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.