The movie watching preferences of citizen of Filmopolis conducted by The Film and Television institute, everyone said they like action movies. However in a second study the researchers found that the most frequently rented were animated children's movies. Therefore, it can be concluded that the respondent in the first study had misrepresented their movie preferences.
The writer's conclusion after the results of first study and second study mismatched that the respondent in the first study misrepresented their movie preferences is quite absurd and is completely based on unjustified assumptions and unjustifiable details.
In Filmopolis a study which conducted a survey on movie-watching most people in the survey said they would like to watch action movies but the authenticity of the survey is not mentioned anywhere. Along with this fact, The Flim and Television institute survey didn't mention the total number of people that were surveyed during this poll.Moreover, not the number people but also the age group of the people interviewed also creates a drastic impact on the outlook of the survey. Based on human psychology people get very easily motivated by the last movie that they have seen hence, it can be a very considerate point to ponder upon that the last famous movie that came might have been an action movie and therefore people tend to have it at the brim of there minds and can be a cause of there likability towards action movies.
Now, taking the second study in consideration that the people rented animated children's movies and thus making the first study wrong are unjust since we can't be sure about the age group and number of people considered for the survey, if the survey was conducted for two different age group people then its quite legitimate that results might differ. Taking it into account that it was conducted for same people it is very vague to say that child animation is more liked because we do not know that weather action movies are available or not in the video store and even if action movies are available are they at the same cost as of animation movies? Even there can be a recent limited period offer on such movies which made the people observed pay for the animation movie and leave the action movie. Secondly is there any new
blockbuster animated movie which had hit the store for people were eagerly waiting for? If such are the cases then the results obtained in the second study are completely false and can't be trusted.
Drawing a sober conclusion that we can't disregard the results obtained in the first study unless and until we are introgressed with all the above questions and hence author's conclusion about people misrepresented their movie preferences is vague and can we subtly answered only when we get into details
- Typically, as people age, their bone mass decreases, making them more vulnerable to bone fractures. A recent study concludes that the most effective way to reduce the risk of fractures in later life is to take twice the recommended dose of vitamin D and c 66
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 66
- "The Mozart School of Music should obviously be the first choice of any music student aware of its reputation. First of all, the Mozart School stresses intensive practice and training, so that students typically begin their training at a very young age. S 66
- The movie watching preferences of citizen of Filmopolis conducted by The Film and Television institute, everyone said they like action movies. However in a second study the researchers found that the most frequently rented were animated children's movies 66
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved two years ago by McAdam Road Builders, is now badly cracked and marred by dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 66, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, is still in 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
The writers conclusion after the results of first s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...he Flim and Television institute survey didnt mention the total number of people that...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...ple that were surveyed during this poll.Moreover, not the number people but also the age...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e first study wrong are unjust since we cant be sure about the age group and number ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 826, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... action movie. Secondly is there any new blockbuster animated movie which had hit...
^^^
Line 6, column 182, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e second study are completely false and cant be trusted. Drawing a sober conclusi...
^^^^
Line 8, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... Drawing a sober conclusion that we cant disregard the results obtained in the f...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 11.1786427146 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 13.6137724551 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 28.8173652695 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 413.0 441.139720559 94% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86924939467 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54299773251 2.78398813304 91% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 204.123752495 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467312348668 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 705.55239521 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.8473053892 179% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.0043677065 57.8364921388 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 201.1 119.503703932 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.3 23.324526521 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.70786347227 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281613575328 0.218282227539 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128114641597 0.0743258471296 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762292954875 0.0701772020484 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148115854786 0.128457276422 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630149301497 0.0628817314937 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 14.3799401198 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.3550499002 62% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.197005988 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 12.3882235529 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.1389221557 165% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.9071856287 168% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.