The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line chart depicts the consumption of fish and various kinds of meat in a European country in the time interval of 25 years. The striking feature of the chart is substantially decreased in the consumption of beef
At a fleeting glance, it is observed that fish consumption was 60 grams per person in 1979 which lowers by 25 grams in the next two decades. Likewise, after 5 years, the consumption remained same. However, individuals took 150 grams of lamb in 1979 which diminished to a greater extent by several ups and downs and left only 65 grams per person.
Not only this, after went through numerous fluctuations, there was a considerable decrement in the consumption of beef which remained almost half of it. On the contrary, intake of chicken steadily dominated the trend and enhanced its consumption by 140 grams per person in the concerned period.
All-in-all, maximum people consumed chicken while remaining individuals devoted less interest to the beef and lamb. Moreover, there was a consistency in the fish inhalation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by almost 20% in the last ten years.Discuss the causes and effects of this disturbing trend. 61
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development? 85
- In many countries schools have severe problems with students behaviour. what do you think are the causes of this? what solutions can you suggest? 56
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 66
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, moreover, so, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90348627655 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7871610811 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171749225267 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794317107883 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850332772166 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10542338914 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847144614767 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.