do you agree or disagree? people can solve important problems by themselves or by their families without referring to the government.
The question is whether people can solve important problems by themselves or by their families without referring to the government or not. Everyone with regard to his private viewpoint can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however I am inclined to affirm that referring to the government for any small problem is unnecessary. My arguments and reasons are listed below which will strengthen my vantage point:
To begin with, it is axiomatic that every family wrestles with a lot of troubles in life; hence they look for finding the perfect solutions. When a family confronts with a problem, since the members of family know each other well and also they are aware from condition of their life; consequently the best choice will be opted without wasting any time.
The second reason why I advocate to people not to refer to the government lies in the fact the cohesion. Inasmuch people usually approach toward each other in hardship time; subsequently there is a chance for the members of family to gather and participate in family sessions for removing the problems. One should not forget that such a problematic circumstance can reinforce the cooperation and participation feeling in a family. It goes without saying that children of these types of families will have a bright future in compared with other children, because they have learned to consult for solving their problems earlier.
Moreover, there is a bit of different point here. Some problems are not related with the government. Take for instance, being anti-social of children. In these cases the families should try to solve the problems with regard to their personal experiences and also with aid of experts.
By taking all above mention arguments this conclusion could be drawn that solving the problems inside the families can provide an advantageous bed. Such families will be able to increase cohesion soul among themselves and also this habit can have a positive effect on their children's future.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2017-01-07 | peerless alex | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree?successful people try new things and take risk than only doing what they already know how to do well. 82
- tpo9 3
- do you agree or disagree? children should play in outside with their friend than staying at home and playing with computers or cell-phones. 90
- tpo26 3
- Do you agree or disagree? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, well, for instance, to begin with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16923076923 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69223912001 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1654546201 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319945438114 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11938614028 0.076458572812 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124659975372 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183320250761 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619741468395 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.