The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Glancing back through history, one will undoubtedly notice that many remarkable changes have been sparked by people questioning authority. Indeed, questioning authority can inspire public’s awareness and contemplation on controversial issues and further incite necessary actions to improve and make changes. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, I generally agree with the statement that the well-being of societies will be enhanced if citizens question authority.
Sometimes when laws or rules are not made proper and fair, people must stand out and argue for their own rights. Take the formation of United States of America as an instance. For many years under the rule of British governments, people in the colonies are unfairly taxed and treated in a bad manner. Not until some wise people stood out and spoke load to argue for the rights they deserve, did American people start to consider themselves to be an independent entity. And it is also because of the very same questioning for authority, years later, USA was established with a different authoritative stance, forming as a democracy governed by its people.
While I mainly support the idea that it benefits society if people question authority, this is not to say that the course will always work well in any situation for every people. Take, as an instance, modern United States government, which has elected officials and well established checks and balances. As leaders are elected directly by citizens, people should be aware that these leaders will serve their constituents as a whole. As a country consists of people with different races, religions, education and profession backgrounds, government has tons of different points of view that need to be taken in to consideration. Therefore, in this case, it may not very efficient if every single individual questions and challenges every decision and every new policy, and it may eventually lead to the hindrance of progressing.
To sum up, given the reasons discussed above, we may safely come to the conclusion that most of the time it would be beneficial for society if its people question the authority in a reasonable way. One cannot achieve any social or political change without questioning authority, and certainly changes have been required in order to enhance well-beings in our history and will still be necessary in the future.
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 50
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad manner" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...colonies are unfairly taxed and treated in a bad manner. Not until some wise people stood out a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reasonable way" with adverb for "reasonable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ty if its people question the authority in a reasonable way. One cannot achieve any social or polit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22834645669 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90724329405 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58530183727 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6531629676 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272383667608 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860916735644 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572914612036 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163522456196 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236889354394 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.