Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture. Do you think it is important for children to be taught art? Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects?
As art constitutes an inevitable part of society, and is regarded as significant implication of cultural characteristics, it is defiantly important to lecture children the basics of art. However, the necessity of art as part of education could not be used to prove its superiority over other primary subjects. Kids are not supposed to be encourage to value arts more than other subjects.
Certainly the pivotal role of art played in any culture or society is undeniable. In fact, we can see arts shapes the culture diversity among human societies, from tribe culture of Africa to liberty western values. By learning art subject such as the tributes of cultural portrait or the history of local music, kids can develop identity self-awareness as well as the sense of beauty. Obviously, it is beneficial to include art as a school module.
Nonetheless, as a basic subject art does not outweigh the importance of the rest of subjects, such as science subjects. Maybe a piece of beautiful music can soothe the wearisome mind of people who just finished a day’s work, but it is the primary subjects like physics and mathematics which help to build the materialistic human habitat. Furthermore, without the corroboration of the rest of the subjects, art could never be fully expressed, just like the construction of skyscraper needs not only atheistic but also the science of balancing every single brick. Therefore, art subject is surly not superior to other objects. As a result, it is not a good idea to encourage children to foster bias about art subjects.
Thus, in my opinion, children would defiantly benefit from studying art in school, but that does not mean art should be given a higher priority to other subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-10 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 70 | view |
| 2017-09-11 | milanree1527@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011.*includes French, German and Spanish 73
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students en 66
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of students en 66
- the first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- Health care should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'valuing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: valuing
.... Kids are not supposed to be encourage to value arts more than other subjects. Certa...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04529616725 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93186061654 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564459930314 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7280528003 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.384615385 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33644934328 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13249362893 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686564943152 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219308458665 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820934191704 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.