The pie chart and table below give information on tourist arrivals in Nepal in March 2008.
The pie chart depicts where tourists to Nepal came from in March 2008 while the table chart reveals the elevation in number from a year. The striking feature of the chart is minimum visits of Australians in March 2008.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that two-third proportion of travelers were Asians as well as Europeans in Nepal during 2008. However, 10% Americans had also explored the Nepal while 11% people were from other countries. Also, only 4% Australians bothered to examine Nepal.
Moving further, as compared to last year, 16% sightseers surged in the March 2008 which was 5910 tourists to be exact. Moreover, out of them, 3321 were Europeans whereas 1043 belonged to the North and South America. Although the remaining were inhabitants of Asia, Australia and other regions.
To sum up, Although there was a significant difference in the trippers of Asia and Europe in 2007 but it became almost uniform in 2008. Citizens of other continents also started to explore Nepal in their leisure time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-14 | Stephanie Kaushal | 78 | view |
| 2014-01-18 | Hamsa137 | 45 | view |
- Nowadays many people work from home. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this situation in particular and of technologically advanced society in general. 56
- The graph and bar chart below show the average monthly rainfall and temperature for one region of East Africa 81
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirementTo what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 78
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010. 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, third, well, whereas, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02339181287 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52198025206 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643274853801 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0884317825 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270688557583 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096375980345 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102877561389 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15843442669 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131742597796 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.